The Natural Food of Man: Being an attempt to prove from comparative anatomy, physiology, chemistry and hygiene, that the original, best and natural diet of man is fruit and nutsCarrington, Hereward
Science
The Natural Food of Man: Being an attempt to prove from comparative anatomy, physiology, chemistry and hygiene, that the original, best and natural diet of man is fruit and nuts
Carrington, Hereward
Food; Vegetarianism
nuts and other substances suited to his economy. This argument alone
should, therefore, as a matter of fact, settle the whole case in favour
of vegetarianism as against flesh-eating, without any further or
additional proof being necessary.
V
THE ARGUMENT FROM HYGIENE
We have seen in the preceding pages that it is perfectly possible for
man to live upon vegetable and kindred foods without necessitating
the eating of animal foods of any character—which merely confirms the
evidence afforded us by a study of comparative anatomy and physiology.
Having thus seen that it is _possible_ for man to live and thrive
upon these foods, the question at once arises: Can man thrive _best_
upon such foods? Can he maintain a _higher_ level of vital and bodily
health, and of mental and moral powers, upon these foods than he can
upon the usual mixed diet of to-day—including meat and its various
products? If it can be shown that this is the case—that a man cannot
only live, but improve in health and bodily strength on the vegetarian
régime—then it will be pretty obvious that this is the diet best suited
for man, and the diet upon which he can thrive best. It would, in fact,
confirm the argument drawn from comparative anatomy, physiology, and
chemistry, and would conclusively prove that man can live and thrive
best upon a diet devoid of flesh.[20]
[20] “ ... The American must be educated in the principles of the
frugivorous diet. ‘Its never too late to learn,’ and ‘now is the
appointed time.’ Unquestionably man can live on a diet of fresh
meats—proof of which is amply afforded by the very fact that the
larger part of the people of the North American continent of to-day
are living almost wholly or largely on such a diet. When it comes to a
discussion of the relative merits of the two diets ... we need go no
further than to chemistry and physiology, which show that the flesh
meats do not begin to contain the same amount of nutriment as do the
nuts, and some of the other articles of vegetable origin.” “The Art of
Living in Good Health,” p. 197. By Daniel S. Sager, M.D.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account