Hickling (36), using an exceptionally powerful microscope, claims to have identified this 'amorphous' substance in china clay as 'worn and fragmental crystals of kaolinite,' and recently Mellor and Holdcroft and Rieke have shown that the apparently amorphous material shows the same endo- and exothermal reactions as crystalline kaolinite. So far as china clays or kaolins are concerned, kaolinite or an amorphous substance of the same composition appears to be identical with the 'ideal clay' or 'true clay' whose characters have so long been sought. This term--clayite--is very convenient when confined to china clays and kaolins, but it is scarcely legitimate to apply it, as has been suggested, to material in other clays until it has been isolated in a sufficiently pure form to enable its properties to be accurately studied. This restriction is the more necessary as in one very important respect clayite obtained from china clay and some kaolins differs noticeably from the nearest approach to it obtainable from the more plastic clays: namely, in its very low plasticity. This may be explained by the fact that it is only obtainable in a reasonably pure form in clays of a primary character, whilst the plastic clays have usually been transported over considerable areas and have been subjected to a variety of treatments which have had a marked effect on their physical character. Moreover, the fact that the purest 'clay' which can be isolated from plastic clays appears to be amorphous and to some extent colloidal greatly increases the difficulty of obtaining it in a pure state, especially as no liquid is known which will dissolve it without decomposing it. The fact that it is not an elementary substance, but a complex compound of silica, alumina and the elements of water, also increases the intricacy of the problem, for these substances occur in other combinations in a variety of other minerals which are clearly distinct from clay.