The Natural History of Pliny, Volume 1 (of 6)Pliny, the Elder
History
The Natural History of Pliny, Volume 1 (of 6)
Pliny, the Elder
Natural history -- Pre-Linnean works
[416] “Junonis quippe templum fulmine violatum ostendit non a Jove, non
a Deis mitti fulmina.” Alexandre in Lemaire, i. 354. The consulate of
Scaurus was in the year of Rome 638. Lucan, i. 155, and Horace, Od. i.
2. refer to the destruction of temples at Rome by lightning.
[417] Obviously because faint flashes are more visible in the night.
[418] We have an explanation of this peculiar opinion in Tertullian, as
referred to by Hardouin, Lemaire. i. 355; “Qui de cœlo tangitur, salvus
est, ut nullo igne decinerescat.”
[419] Although it has been thought necessary by M. Fée, in the notes to
Ajasson’s trans., ii. 384, 385, to enter into a formal examination of
this opinion of the author’s, I conceive that few of our readers will
agree with him in this respect.
[420] Suetonius informs us, that Augustus always wore a seal’s skin for
this purpose; Octavius, § 90.
[421] The eagle was represented by the ancients with a thunderbolt in
its claws.
[422] There is strong evidence for the fact, that, at different
times, various substances have fallen from the atmosphere, sometimes
apparently of mineral, and, at other times, of animal or vegetable
origin. Some of these are now referred to those peculiar bodies termed
aërolites, the nature and source of which are still doubtful, although
their existence is no longer so. These bodies have, in other instances,
been evidently discharged from distant volcanoes, but there are many
cases where the substance could not be supposed to have proceeded
from a volcano, and where, in the present state of our knowledge,
it appears impossible to offer an explanation of their nature, or
the source whence they are derived. We may, however, conclude,
that notwithstanding the actual occurrence of a few cases of this
description, a great proportion of those enumerated by the ancients
were either entirely without foundation or much exaggerated. We meet
with several variations of what we may presume to have been aërolites
in Livy; for example, xxiv. 10, xxx. 38, xli. 9, xliii. 13, and xliv.
18, among many others. As naturally may be expected, we have many
narratives of this kind in Jul. Obsequens.
[423] The same region from which lightning was supposed to proceed.
[424] We have several relations of this kind in Livy, xxiv. 10, xxxix.
46 and 56, xl. 19, and xliii. 13. The red snow which exists in certain
alpine regions, and is found to depend upon the presence of the Uredo
nivalis, was formerly attributed to showers of blood.
[425] This occurrence may probably be referred to an aërolite, while
the wool mentioned below, i. e. a light flocculent substance, was
perhaps volcanic.
[426]
Armorum sonitum toto Germania cœlo
Audiit.—Virgil, Geor. i. 474, 475.
“ ... in Jovis Vicilini templo, quod in Compsano agro est, arma
concrepuisse.” Livy, xxiv. 44.
[427] See Plutarch, by Langhorne; Marius, iii. 133.
[428] See Livy, iii. 5 & 10, xxxi. 12, xxxii. 9, _et alibi_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account