The Natural History of Pliny, Volume 1 (of 6)Pliny, the Elder
History
The Natural History of Pliny, Volume 1 (of 6)
Pliny, the Elder
Natural history -- Pre-Linnean works
[441] “Velini lacus ... præcipiti cursu in gurgitem subjectum defertur,
et illo aquarum lapsu, dispersis in aëra guttis humidis, ... iridis
multiplicis phænomenon efficit....” Alexandre, in Lemaire, i. 365.
[442] We have an example in Martial, v. 34. 9, of the imprecation which
has been common in all ages:
Mollia nec rigidus cespes tegat ossa, nec illi
Terra gravis fueris;
and in Seneca’s Hippolytus, _sub finem_:
... istam terra defossam premat,
Gravisque tellus impio capiti incubet.
[443] The author refers to this opinion, xxix. 23, when describing the
effects of venomous animals.
[444] inertium; “ultione abstinentium,” as explained by Alexandre, in
Lemaire, i. 367.
[445] “Quod mortis genus a terræ meritis et benignitate valde
abhorret.” Hardouin, in Lemaire, i. 367.
[446] “Terra, inquit, sola est, e quatuor naturæ partibus sive
elementis, adversus quam ingrati simus.” Alexandre, in Lemaire, i. 368.
[447] “Est ironiæ formula. Quid, ait, feras et serpentes et venena
terræ exprobramus, quæ ne ad tuendam quidem illam satis valent?”
Alexandre, in Lemaire, i. 369.
[448] “ossa vel insepulta cum tempore tellus occultat, deprimentia
pondere suo mollitam pluviis humum.” Alexandre, in Lemaire, i. 370.
[449] “figura prima.” I may refer to the second chapter of this book,
where the author remarked upon the form of the earth as perfect in all
its parts, and especially adapted for its supposed position in the
centre of the universe.
[450] “... si capita linearum comprehendantur ambitu;” the meaning of
this passage would appear to be: if the extremities of the lines drawn
from the centre of the earth to the different parts of the surface were
connected together, the result of the whole would be a sphere. I must,
however, remark, that Hardouin interprets it in a somewhat different
manner; “Si per extremitates linearum ductarum a centro ad _summos_
quosque vertices montium circulus exigatur.” Lemaire, i. 370.
[451] “... immensum ejus globum in formam orbis assidua circa eam mundi
volubilitate cogente.” As Hardouin remarks, the word _mundus_ is here
used in the sense of _cœlum_. Lemaire, i. 371.
[452] As our author admits of the existence of antipodes, and expressly
states that the earth is a perfect sphere, we may conclude that the
resemblance to the cone of the pine is to be taken in a very general
sense. How far the ancients entertained correct opinions respecting the
globular figure of the earth, or rather, at what period this opinion
became generally admitted, it is perhaps not easy to ascertain. The
lines in the Georgics, i. 242, 243, which may be supposed to express
the popular opinion in the time of Virgil, certainly do not convey the
idea of a sphere capable of being inhabited in all its parts:
Hic vertex nobis semper sublimis; at illum
Sub pedibus Styx atra videt, manesque profundi.
[453] “spiritus vis mundo inclusi.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account