The Natural History of the Varieties of Man — John Shaqi
The Natural History of the Varieties of ManLatham, R. G. (Robert Gordon)
Science
The Natural History of the Varieties of Man
Latham, R. G. (Robert Gordon)
Ethnology
A. _Terms descriptive of differences in the way of physical
conformation._--If we were to take three individual specimens of
the human species, which should exhibit three of the most important
differences, they would, I think, be--1. A Mongolian, or a Tungús, from
Central or Siberian Asia; 2, a Negro from the Delta of the Niger; and
3, a European from France, Germany, or England. At the first view the
Negro would seem the most unlike of the three; and, perhaps, he would
do so after a minute and careful scrutiny. Still, the characteristic
and differential features of the Asiatic would be of a very remarkable
kind. In the _general_ profile, in the form of the eye, in the front
view of the face, he would differ from both. In the colour of his skin,
in the character of his hair, and in the _lower_ part of his profile,
he would differ from the Negro. In the _upper_ portion of the profile,
and in the outline of the _head_, he would differ from the European.
The Mongolian's, or Tungusian's, face would be broad and flat, with the
cheek-bones prominent. The breadth of the head from side to side would
be nearly equal to its length from the forehead to the occiput; the
nose would be flat, and, almost certainly, neither arched nor aquiline;
the eyes would be drawn upwards at their outer angle, the skin would
be of a yellowish-brown, the hair straight, the beard scanty, and the
stature undersized.
The Negro, besides his black complexion and crisp hair, would exhibit
a greater depth of head measuring from before backwards, and the upper
jaw would be much more projecting. Possibly it might be so prominent
as to give the head the appearance of being placed _behind_ the face
rather than _above_ it.
The European would be characterized by negative rather than positive
qualities. His face would be less broad, and his head would have
greater depth in proportion to its breadth than would be the case with
the Mongol. As compared with the African he would differ most in the
parts between the nose and chin. The mouth of the Negro, instead of
lying _under_ the nose and forehead, projects forwards, in a slightly
elongated shape, so as, in extreme cases, to be a _muzzle_ rather than
a mouth; the effect of which, as already stated, is to throw the upper
part of the face and head _behind_ the jaw. In the European profile,
on the other hand, the general direction is vertical. The upper jaw
does not _project_, and the forehead does not _retire_; so that the
forehead, nose, and mouth are, comparatively speaking, nearly in the
same line.
Now these distinctions we find in looking at the face only; those of
the Mongolian being best shown in a front view, those of the Negro
and European in profile. They are also those that would be drawn by a
painter or a sculptor; _i.e._ such as we can detect by merely examining
the outline and surface of the head and face. They are _external_.
Differences in the colour of the eyes and the form of the limbs might
also be easily discovered.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account