It has long been customary to regard John Aubrey as a credulous and gossiping narrator of anecdotes of doubtful authority, and as an ignorant believer of the most absurd stories. This notion was grounded chiefly upon the prejudiced testimony of Anthony a Wood, and on the contents of the only work which Aubrey published during his lifetime,—an amusing collection of “Miscellanies” relating to dreams, apparitions, witchcraft, and similar subjects. Though his “History of Surrey” was of a more creditable character, and elicited the approval of Manning and Bray, the subsequent historians of that county, an unfavourable opinion of Aubrey long continued to prevail. The publication of his “Lives of Eminent Men” tended, however, to raise him considerably in the estimation of discriminating critics; and in my own “Memoir” of his personal and literary career, with its accompanying analysis of his unpublished works, I endeavoured (and I believe successfully) to vindicate his claims to a distinguished place amongst the literati of his times. That he has been unjustly stigmatised amongst his contemporaries as an especial votary of superstition is obvious, even on a perusal of his most objectionable work, the “Miscellanies” already mentioned, which plainly shews that his more scientific contemporaries, including even some of the most eminent names in our country’s literary annals, participated in the same delusions. It would be amusing to compare the “Natural History of Wiltshire” with two similar works on “Oxfordshire” and “Staffordshire,” by Dr. Robert Plot, which procured for their author a considerable reputation at the time of their publication, and which still bear a favourable character amongst the topographical works of the seventeenth century. It may be sufficient here to state that the chapters in those publications on the Heavens and Air, Waters, Earths, Stones, Formed stones, Plants, Beastes, Men and Women, Echoes, Devils and Witches, and other subjects, are very similar to those of Aubrey. Indeed the plan of the latter’s work was modelled upon those of Dr. Plot, and Aubrey states in his Preface that he endeavoured to induce that gentleman to undertake the arrangement and publication of his “Natural History of Wiltshire”. On comparing the writings of the two authors, we cannot hesitate to award superior merits to the Wiltshire antiquary. A few passages may be quoted from the latter to shew that he was greatly in advance of his contemporaries in general knowledge and liberality of sentiment:— “I have oftentimes wished for a mappe of England coloured according to the colours of the earth; with markes of the fossiles and minerals.” (p. 10.) “As the motion caused by a stone lett fall into the water is by circles, so sounds move by spheres in the same manner; which, though obvious enough, I doe not remember to have seen in any booke.” (p. 18.)