The Natural Philosophy of William Gilbert and His PredecessorsKing, W. James (William James)
History
The Natural Philosophy of William Gilbert and His Predecessors
King, W. James (William James)
Gilbert, William, 1544-1603; Magnetism -- History
As we shall see, Gilbert continued in the same tradition, but his
interpretation of form and formal cause was much more anthropomorphic
than that of his predecessors.
Gilbert began his _De magnete_ by expounding the natural history of
that portion of the earth with which we are familiar.[44]
Having declared the origin and nature of the loadstone, we
hold it needful first to give the history of iron also ...
before we come to the explication of difficulties connected
with the loadstone ... we shall better understand what iron
is when we shall have developed ... what are the causes and
the matter of metals ...
His treatment of the origin of minerals and rocks agreed in the main
with that of Aristotle,[45] but he departed somewhat from the
peripatetic doctrine of the four elements of fire, air, water, and
earth.[46] Instead, he replaced them by a pair of elements.[47] (If
the rejection of the four Aristotelian elements were clearer, one
might consider this a part of his rejection of the geocentric universe
but he did not define his position sufficiently.)[48]
[41] Richard Hooker. _Of the laws of ecclesiastical polity_,
bk. 1, ch. 3, sect. 4 (_Works_, Oxford, Clarendon Press,
1865, vol. 1, p. 157)
[42] Francis Bacon, _De augmentis scientiarum_, bk. 3, ch. 4,
in _Works_, ed. J. Spedding, R. L. Ellis, and D. D. Heath,
Boston, n.d. (1900?), vol. 2, p. 267.
[43] _The poems of John Donne_, ed. H. J. C. Grierson,
London, Oxford University Press, 1933, p. 175 ("To the
Countesse of Bedford, On New Yeares Day").
[44] M: pp. 33, 34.
[45] M: pp. 34, 35. Aristotle, _Works_, ed. W. D. Ross,
Oxford, 1908--1952, vol. 2, _De generatione et corruptione_,
translated by H. H. Joachim, 1930, vol. 3, _Meteorologica_,
translated by E. W. Webster, 1931.
[46] M: pp. 34, 35, 64, 65, 69, 81. Dr. H. Guerlac has kindly
brought to my attention the similarity between the
explanation given in Gilbert and that given in the
_Meteorologica_, bk. 3, ch. 6. p. 378.
[47] M: p. 83.
[48] A statement of the relation between Aristotle's four
elements and place can be found in Maier, _op. cit._
(footnote 17), pp. 143-182.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account