The Nature of Animal LightHarvey, E. Newton (Edmund Newton)
Science
The Nature of Animal Light
Harvey, E. Newton (Edmund Newton)
Phosphorescence
While the accompanying list of luminous genera aims to be fairly
complete, there are no doubt omissions and some inaccuracies in it.
Anyone who has ever tried to determine what animal is responsible for
the occasional flashes of light observed on agitating almost any sample
of sea water will realize how difficult it is to discover the luminous
form among a host of non-luminous ones, especially if the animal is
microscopic in size. It is not surprising, then, to find many false
reports of luminous animals in the literature of the subject and we
cannot be too careful in accepting as luminous a reported case. The
difficulty lies chiefly in the fact that all luminous organisms with the
exception of bacteria, fungi, and a few fish, flash only on stimulation,
and, while it is easy enough to see the flash, the animal is lost
between the flashes. The only safe way to detect luminous organisms is
to add a little ammonia to the sea water. This slowly kills the
organisms and causes any luminous forms to glow with a steady,
continuous light for some time, a condition accompanying the death of
the animal. Not all observers, however, have followed this method. One
must always be on guard against confusing the light from a supposed
luminous form with the light from truly luminous organisms living upon
it. The reported cases of luminosity among marine algæ are now known to
be due to hydroids or unicellular organisms living on the alga.
We know also that many non-luminous forms may become infected with
luminous bacteria, not only after death, but also while living, so that
their luminescence is purely secondary. Giard and Billet (1889-90)
succeeded in inoculating many different kinds of amphipod crustacea
(_Talitrus_, _Orchestia_, _Ligia_) and isopod crustacea (_Porcellio_,
_Philoscia_) with luminous bacteria, in some cases passing the infection
from one to the next through nine individuals. Curiously enough the
bacterium did not produce light on artificial culture media but did when
growing in the body of the crustacea, which were killed in about seven
days by the infection. The species of _Talitrus_ and _Orchestia_ might
easily have been taken for truly luminous animals if not carefully
investigated.
Tarchanoff (1901) has injected luminous bacteria into the dorsal lymph
sac of frogs with the result that the animals continued to glow for
three to four days, especially about the tongue. I remember once while
collecting luminous beetles in Cuba, I was astounded to find a frog
which was luminous. Expecting this animal to be of great interest, I
examined it further only to find that the frog had just finished a
hearty meal of fireflies, whose light was shining through the belly with
considerable intensity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account