The Nature of Animal LightHarvey, E. Newton (Edmund Newton)
Science
The Nature of Animal Light
Harvey, E. Newton (Edmund Newton)
Phosphorescence
3. The next _Difference_ to be mentioned is, that a _live Coal_,
being put into a small close Glass, will not continue to _burn_ for
very many _Minutes_; but a Piece of _shining Wood_ will continue to
shine for _some_ whole _Days_....
4. A _fourth Difference_ may be this: that whereas a _Coal_, as it
_burns_, sends forth Store of _Smoke_ or _Exhalations_, _luminous
Wood_ does not so.
5. A _fifth_, flowing from the former, is, that whereas a _Coal_ in
_shining_ wastes itself at a great Rate, _shining Wood_ does not....
6. The last Difference I shall take notice of betwixt the bodies
hitherto compared is, that a _quick Coal_ is actually and vehemently
hot; whereas I have not observed _shining Wood_ to be so much as
sensibly _lukewarm_."
It should be clearly borne in mind that if we place luminous organisms,
say bacteria or fungi, in an atmosphere devoid of oxygen and find that
no light is produced, this may merely mean that certain functions of the
cell are interfered with, including light production, but does not
necessarily indicate that oxygen is actually used up in the photogenic
process. If we find, however, that extracts of luminous cells or
luminous secretions devoid of cells cease to light when the oxygen is
removed and again luminesce when it is returned, we may be quite certain
that the photogenic process itself requires free oxygen. As luminous
extracts of fireflies, pennatulids, ostracods, _Pholas_ and others give
off no light when the oxygen is removed, we may safely conclude that for
these luminescences, oxygen is necessary. Bacteria, fungi, and
_Noctiluca_, whose light also disappears in absence of oxygen, although
they are whole cells, we may by analogy also assume to require oxygen in
the photogenic process.
Some of the earlier workers on fireflies and _Noctiluca_ obtained light
even after placing these organisms in absence of oxygen, but they did
not realize how low is the amount of oxygen necessary to produce light.
It is difficult to remove traces of oxygen from the water, traces which
are nevertheless sufficient to cause luminescence. If the organisms are
numerous, as in an emulsion of luminous bacteria, they will themselves
use up all the oxygen and the liquid soon ceases to glow except at the
surface in contact with air. We may gain an idea of the amount of oxygen
necessary for luminescence from an experiment of Beijerinck (1902). He
mixed luminous bacteria with an emulsion of clover leaves containing
chloroplasts and kept the two in the dark until all the oxygen was used
up and the bacteria ceased to glow. If now a match was struck for a
fraction of a second, sufficient oxygen was formed by photosynthesis to
cause the bacteria to luminesce for a short time.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account