The nature of man : $b Studies in optimistic philosophyMetchnikoff, Elie
Philosophy
The nature of man : $b Studies in optimistic philosophy
Metchnikoff, Elie
Human beings; Human biology; Life (Biology)
Apart from their chief function of consoling men for the inevitability
of death, religions have concerned themselves with some of the results
of other disharmonies of the human constitution. From time immemorial
they have claimed the direction of diet, the control of the reproductive
functions and the prevention or cure of all kinds of disease.
The dietary regulations given by the religions are familiar. Even at the
present day, the cookery of many races is regulated by their religion.
The Jewish diet, notably, is regulated by the Mosaic law, down to the
most minute detail. For instance, it was forbidden to eat the blood of
animals. Moses commanded: “Notwithstanding, thou mayest kill and eat
flesh in all thy gates, whatsoever thy soul lusteth after, according to
the blessing of the Lord thy God, which he hath given thee; the unclean
and the clean may eat thereof, as of the roebuck, and as of the hart.
Only ye shall not eat the blood; ye shall pour it on the earth as
water.”[202] Later on: “Only be sure that thou eat not the blood; for
the blood is the life; and thou mayest not eat the life with the
flesh.”[203] “Thou shalt not eat it, that it may go well with thee, and
with thy children after thee, when thou shalt do that which is right in
the sight of the Lord.”[204] The Books of Moses also contain receipts
for the cooking of certain meats. “Eat not of it raw, nor sodden at all
with water, but roast with fire, his head with his legs, and with the
purtenance thereof.”[205]
It has been suggested that these rules were founded on ideas of hygiene
in consonance with the results of modern science. Some of them, it is
true, such as the prohibition of uncooked or partially cooked meat, are
confirmed by our modern knowledge. But the greater number of the Mosaic
rules, as, for instance, the prohibition of the consumption as food of
blood or the flesh of pigs or hares and so forth, are in direct
opposition to a modern knowledge of hygienic diet. Religious cookery has
no more than a historical interest.
The religions have been greatly occupied with the functions of the
reproductive organs. Most of the founders of the great faiths have paid
a keen attention to the disharmonies of this side of our constitution.
They became persuaded of the merit of abstention, which they practised
themselves and preached to others. Buddha, after devoting his youth to
all the pleasures and not being satisfied, passed to absolute
asceticism. He and his adepts formed an order of monkhood, on which an
absolute celibacy was imposed. If a member of the order had intercourse
with a woman, he was considered to be as guilty as a murderer or a
thief. In the Buddhist rules framed even for laymen, “sexual intercourse
outside marriage was forbidden, on the ground that it was
degrading.”[206]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account