The nature of man : $b Studies in optimistic philosophyMetchnikoff, Elie
Philosophy
The nature of man : $b Studies in optimistic philosophy
Metchnikoff, Elie
Human beings; Human biology; Life (Biology)
Greek philosophy had an equally high opinion of human nature, of the
human body, and of representations of the human body. Just as Greek art
aimed at the presentation of the body of man, so Greek philosophy
proclaimed the nobility of all human qualities, and inculcated the
doctrine of a harmonious development of all sides of human nature.[4]
Such a doctrine was formulated by Plato, and became a fundamental
principle of the Old Academy; the New Academy assumed it, and handed it
on to the Sceptics. According to Xenocrates (fourth century), who
belonged to the Old Academy, happiness consisted not only in the
possession of human virtue, but in the accomplishment of all natural
acts.[5]
The principle of a worship of human nature is in itself rather vague,
and it is not surprising that disputes and contradictions arose in
relation to its application. Thus Plato excluded pleasure from his
conception of the good, while Aristotle, Plato’s pupil, held a contrary
opinion. For the latter pleasure was the natural motive of human action,
and its attainment was associated as intimately with the perfect life as
beauty and health were associated with the perfect human body.[6]
Under the name _Matriopathy_ there arose, in the ancient world, a
doctrine the object of which was the study of the goal of natural
morality. This doctrine was held by many philosophers, but these applied
it to the details of actual life in very different fashions. Thus, for
the Stoics, the _summum bonum_ and happiness, the most lofty aim, could
not be found except by conforming life to nature. Conduct was to be
brought into harmony with the rational order of nature in such a fashion
that every conscious and rational being would perform no actions that
could not be deduced from the general law.[7] The same principle of a
life in harmony with nature led the Epicureans to the conclusion that
“pleasure is a natural good, that is to say, a condition conformable
with nature, and so bringing with it intrinsic contentment.”[8] Setting
out from the same fundamental principle, the theories of the Stoics and
Epicureans led in opposite directions.
The Roman philosophers adopted the principle of a life strictly natural.
Seneca, for instance,[9] enunciated the maxim: “Take nature as your
guide, for so reason bids you and advises you; to live happily is to
live naturally.”
Without following through the centuries the development of the idea in
detail, I may content myself with saying that resort has been made to
it, wherever there was sought, outside the sanction of religion, a
rational principle to guide human conduct. It recurs even among those
convinced Christians who rebelled against the asceticism and hatred of
human nature that became prevalent in the early centuries of the
Christian era.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account