The nature of man : $b Studies in optimistic philosophyMetchnikoff, Elie
Philosophy
The nature of man : $b Studies in optimistic philosophy
Metchnikoff, Elie
Human beings; Human biology; Life (Biology)
These idealistic systems, when they reached their final point, provoked
a reaction consisting in the rejection of all formulas based on
speculation. They were succeeded by a dogmatic materialism, which in its
turn gave place to a sceptical positivism, or rather to a form of
agnosticism. Granted the impossibility of belief in the immortality of
the soul or in eternal life in any shape, the philosophy regarding death
was reduced to the stoical idea that our end is in harmony with the laws
of nature, and that it must therefore be accepted without protest.
Resignation, therefore, in the fullest sense of the word, became the
watchword of human wisdom.
It was only to be expected that certain courageous and independent
thinkers should not agree with this conclusion, and attempt to discover
some other solution of the great problem absorbing mankind. Thence arose
pessimism, the philosophic theory which became so prevalent during the
last century, and which claims so many adherents in the present day.
Pessimism, like belief in the immortality of the soul and the advocacy
of resignation to the evils which beset humanity, is the product of the
East, and India was probably its nursery. A pessimistic view of life is
a salient feature of Brahminism, but Buddhism develops even more fully
the doctrine that everything of this world is evil. That “life is made
up of suffering” is the inexhaustible theme which, whether in the shape
of philosophical argument, or in the more attractive form of poetry, the
Buddhist Scriptures din ceaselessly in our ears.[212]
In Europe, the lyrical poets introduced the pessimistic conception of
the world, attracted by its emotional appeal. At the beginning of the
nineteenth century, Byron struck this sad note, and expressed the view
in the clearest fashion, that if we weighed our hours of joy against our
days of pain, we should perceive clearly that whatever our life had been
it were better not have been. In the following lines his conception of
life is apparent:—
“Our life is a false nature,—’tis not in
The harmony of things, this hard decree,
This uneradicable taint of sin,
This boundless Upas, this all-blasting tree,
Whose root is earth, whose leaves and branches be
The skies, which rain their plagues on men like dew—
Disease, death, bondage—all the woes we see—
And, worse, the woes we see not—which throbs through
The immedicable soul, with heart-aches ever new.”
“EUTHANASIA.”
In chap. vi. I showed that Byron was haunted by a fear of death which
ultimately led him to a recognition of the instinctive character of the
feeling. He, however, like the other pessimistic poets (Leopardi), did
not regard the world as being merely part of a universal system, and it
was left to philosophy to come to this conclusion.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account