The nature of man : $b Studies in optimistic philosophyMetchnikoff, Elie
Philosophy
The nature of man : $b Studies in optimistic philosophy
Metchnikoff, Elie
Human beings; Human biology; Life (Biology)
Towards the end of the old world, the Greek theory of human nature
yielded to a very different conception. The opposition between the
opinions of the Stoics on morality, and their admiration of human
nature, led Seneca, one of the last Roman Stoics and a celebrated
contemporary of Jesus Christ, to break completely away from the ancient
doctrine. Convinced of the moral weakness and imperfection of man, and
of the persisting power of evil, Seneca declared that human nature
contained a vicious and essentially evil element. This element was
seated in the body, which he regarded as so essentially vile that it is
to be despised. Our body was no more than the dwelling of the soul, its
temporary home, a place in which it cannot be at rest. The body was a
burden which the soul would be rid of, a prison-house from which it
would escape. According to Seneca[19] the soul must wrestle with the
body, for the body brings to it nothing but suffering, while the soul is
essentially pure and spotless, and as much above the body as divinity is
above matter.
A dualism still more pronounced was characteristic of the early
Christian view of human nature, and led to the depreciation of the body
as compared with the soul. In the fourth and fifth centuries of our era
such a view was so dominant that a struggle against the material side of
our nature became a rule of life. The most absolute asceticism spread
throughout the Christian world.[20] A struggle against hunger, thirst,
and desire for sleep, rejection of all pleasures that come from
impressions of sight, of hearing, or of the palate, and, above all,
abstention from sexual intercourse, became, in the opinion of believers,
the true aim of human life. The conviction that human nature was
essentially corrupt led to a declaration of war against it; all the
pleasures were forbidden, even the most innocent of them being thought
vicious. What could be more in contrast with the calm and joyous
philosophy of the Greeks, for whom there did not exist the idea of a
struggle against the supposed corruption and imperfection of man? The
dualistic theory made such demands on its proselytes that these,
absorbed in the salvation of their souls, sank from the physical point
of view to the level of wild beasts. Hermits resorted to the lairs of
animals, abandoned their clothing and went about naked with shaggy and
disordered hair. In Mesopotamia and a part of Syria there arose a sect
of eaters of grass; these were people who had no dwellings and who ate
neither bread nor vegetables, but wandered on the hills and fed on the
herbage. Cleanliness of the body was regarded as an indication of
corruptness of the soul, and among the most highly venerated of the
saints were those who took no care of the body. Athanasius relates with
approval that when St. Antony, the father of monks, became old he never
washed his feet.[21]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account