The nature of man : $b Studies in optimistic philosophyMetchnikoff, Elie
Philosophy
The nature of man : $b Studies in optimistic philosophy
Metchnikoff, Elie
Human beings; Human biology; Life (Biology)
The facts that I have cited show that death is not necessarily inherent
in living organisms. Naegeli,[322] a well-known German botanist, has
asserted even that natural death does not exist in nature. He points out
that trees, more than a thousand years old, perish not by natural death,
that is to say, by the gradual decay of their vitality, but by some
catastrophe.
[Illustration:
FIG. 17.—_Chætogaster_ about to divide into four (from a drawing by M.
Mesnil).
]
The age of the famous dragontree of the Villa Oratava at Teneriffe,
admired by Von Humboldt, was estimated at several thousand years. Its
trunk was hollow, but the huge monster continued to flourish until it
was overthrown by a storm. It was only by a catastrophe that the
long-lived giant perished. The Baobab is reputed to live for five or six
thousand years.
In a recently published essay, Jacques Loeb,[323] a distinguished
biologist in Chicago, has made a study of natural death, and has come to
the conclusion that there is no good evidence for its existence. He has
observed that ripe, but unfertilised eggs of sea hedgehogs (Echini) die
a few hours after they have been discharged. Loeb thinks that this may
be a case of natural death, but I cannot agree with this opinion, as an
egg that has not been fertilised by a spermatozoon may be compared with
an organism deprived of its nutrition and so dying of starvation. In
both cases death is purely accidental and could have been avoided.
If natural death does exist, it must have appeared on the face of the
earth long after the appearance of life. Weismann has suggested that
death arose as an adaptation for the advantage of the species, that is
to say, in relation to the surrounding conditions of existence, and not
as an absolute necessity inherent in the nature of the living substance.
He thought that as worn organisms are no longer suited for reproduction
or for the struggle for life, natural death was due to natural
selection, it being necessary to maintain the species in a vigorous
state by weeding out the debased individuals. But the introduction of
death for that purpose was superfluous, since the debility caused by old
age in itself would eliminate the aged in the course of the struggle for
existence. Violent death must have appeared almost as soon as living
things came into being. The infusorians and other low organisms, despite
their potential immortality, must have been subjected perpetually to
violent death, falling victims to larger and stronger organisms. It is
impossible to regard natural death, if indeed it actually exists, as the
product of natural selection for the benefit of the species. In the
press of the world natural death rarely could come into operation,
because maladies or the voracity of enemies so frequently cause violent
death.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account