The nature of man : $b Studies in optimistic philosophyMetchnikoff, Elie
Philosophy
The nature of man : $b Studies in optimistic philosophy
Metchnikoff, Elie
Human beings; Human biology; Life (Biology)
As for man, the creature most interesting to us, in what category does
he fall? Is he a being whose nature is in harmony with the conditions in
which he has to live, or is he out of harmony with his environment? A
critical examination is needed to answer these questions, and to such an
examination the pages to follow are devoted.
CHAPTER III
SIMIAN ORIGIN OF MAN
Relationship of the human species with anthropoid apes—Analogies in
the dentition, in the organisation of the limbs and of the
brain—Resemblance of the vermiform appendage of man and
anthropoids—Analogy between the placenta and fœtus of man and
anthropoid apes—Blood relationship of man and monkeys shown by serums
and precipitates—Transmutation of species—Sudden transition from
monkey to man—J. Inaudi, the calculator, as an example of the sudden
appearance of characters in the human species—Rudimentary organs in
man—Proportion of progressive and retrogressive organs in the
organisation of man
To understand human nature it is necessary first to give an account of
the origin of man. This question has preoccupied mankind for ages, and
for a long time it was believed that a solution of the problem was to be
found in religious dogmas. Man was regarded as being of supernatural
origin, the result of a special creation. Scientific criticism has now
shown that there are no grounds for such a conclusion.
Nearly half a century ago Darwin applied to man his discovery of the
principle of natural selection, and of the part played by that in the
origin and transmutation of species. Soon after the publication of the
“Origin of Species,” attention was given to the special case of man. In
1863 Huxley[48] gave an admirable review of the problem in his work on
“Man’s Place in Nature.” He brought forward arguments of the highest
scientific validity in support of the thesis that man is descended from
animals, and that he is a mammal most nearly related to monkeys, and
among these to the anthropoid apes. In spite of this masterly
exposition, there are still persons of high intelligence and superior
education who declare that science has not yet answered the question as
to whence he came, and that the theory of evolution will never provide
an answer.[49] Close examination of the structure of man has proved, in
the most definite fashion, the existence of a near kinship with the
higher monkeys, or anthropoids. When the chimpanzee and the
ourang-outang were discovered, comparison became inevitable, and many
naturalists, including the great Linnæus, saw that the human race must
find its place in classification near the anthropoids.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account