The nature of the physical worldEddington, Arthur Stanley, Sir
Philosophy
The nature of the physical world
Eddington, Arthur Stanley, Sir
Physics -- Philosophy; Science -- Philosophy
Consequences of the Contraction. This result alone, although it
may not quite lead you to the theory of relativity, ought to make you
uneasy about classical physics. The physicist when he wishes to measure
a length—and he cannot get far in any experiment without measuring a
length—takes a scale and turns it in the direction needed. It never
occurred to him that in spite of all precautions the scale would change
length when he did this; but unless the earth happens to be at rest a
change must occur. The constancy of a measuring scale is the rock on
which the whole structure of physics has been reared; and that rock has
crumbled away. You may think that this assumption cannot have betrayed
the physicist very badly; the changes of length cannot be serious or
they would have been noticed. Wait and see.
Let us look at some of the consequences of the FitzGerald contraction.
First take what may seem to be a rather fantastic case. Imagine you are
on a planet moving very fast indeed, say 161,000 miles a second. For
this speed the contraction is one-half. Any solid contracts to half its
original length when turned from across to along the line of motion.
A railway journey between two towns which was 100 miles at noon is
shortened to 50 miles at 6 p.m. when the planet has turned through a
[Pg 9]
right angle. The inhabitants copy Alice in Wonderland; they pull out
and shut up like a telescope.
I do not know of a planet moving at 161,000 miles a second, but I
could point to a spiral nebula far away in space which is moving at
1000 miles a second. This may well contain a planet and (speaking
unprofessionally) perhaps I shall not be taking too much licence if I
place intelligent beings on it. At 1000 miles a second the contraction
is not large enough to be appreciable in ordinary affairs; but it is
quite large enough to be appreciable in measurements of scientific or
even of engineering accuracy. One of the most fundamental procedures
in physics is to measure lengths with a scale moved about in any way.
Imagine the consternation of the physicists on this planet when they
learn that they have made a mistake in supposing that their scale is
a constant measure of length. What a business to go back over all the
experiments ever performed, apply the corrections for orientation of
the scale at the time, and then consider de novo the inferences
and system of physical laws to be deduced from the amended data! How
thankful our own physicists ought to be that they are not in this
runaway nebula but on a decently slow-moving planet like the earth!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account