The nature of the physical worldEddington, Arthur Stanley, Sir
Philosophy
The nature of the physical world
Eddington, Arthur Stanley, Sir
Physics -- Philosophy; Science -- Philosophy
The relation between two human individuals in its broadest
sense comprises every kind of connection or comparison between
them—consanguinity, business transactions, comparative stature, skill
at golf—any kind of description in which both are involved. For
generality we shall suppose that the relations in our world-material
are likewise composite and in no way expressible in numerical measure.
Nevertheless there must be some kind of comparability or likeness
of relations, as there is in the relations of human individuals;
otherwise there would be nothing more to be said about the world than
that everything in it was utterly unlike everything else. To put it
another way, we must postulate not only relations between the relata
but some kind of relation of likeness between some of the relations.
The slightest concession in this direction will enable us to link the
[Pg 232]
whole into a structure.
We assume then that, considering a relation between two relata, it
will in general be possible to pick out two other relata close at hand
which stand to one another in a “like” relation. By “like” I do not
mean “like in every respect”, but like in respect to one of the aspects
of the composite relation. How is the particular aspect selected? If
our relata were human individuals different judgments of likeness
would be made by the genealogist, the economist, the psychologist, the
sportsman, etc.; and the building of structure would here diverge along
a number of different lines. Each could build his own world-structure
from the common basal material of humanity. There is no reason to deny
that a similar diversity of worlds could be built out of our postulated
material. But all except one of these worlds will be stillborn. Our
labour will be thrown away unless the world we have built is the one
which the mind chooses to vivify into a world of experience. The only
definition we can give of the aspect of the relations chosen for the
criterion of likeness, is that it is the aspect which will ultimately
be concerned in the getting into touch of mind with the physical world.
But that is beyond the province of physics.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account