The Nautilus. Vol. XXXI, No. 2, October 1917: A Quarterly Journal Devoted to the Interests of Conchologists — John Shaqi
The Nautilus. Vol. XXXI, No. 2, October 1917: A Quarterly Journal Devoted to the Interests of ConchologistsVarious
Science
The Nautilus. Vol. XXXI, No. 2, October 1917: A Quarterly Journal Devoted to the Interests of Conchologists
Various
Mollusks -- Periodicals
NEW AND LITTLE KNOWN SPECIES OF SOUTH AMERICAN MUSSELS OF THE GENUS
DIPLODON. By William B. Marshall (Proc. U. S. Nat. Museum, Vol. 53, pp.
381‒388, Pls. 50‒55, August, 1917). Two new species _Diplodon
felipponei_ and _D. fortis_ are described and figured, together with six
species described by Mr. C. T. Simpson in his Descriptive Catalogue of
the Naiades and not previously figured.
* * * * *
NOTES ON THE SHELLS OF THE GENUS EPITONIUM AND ITS ALLIES OF THE PACIFIC
COAST OF AMERICA. By William H. Dall (Proc. U. S. Nat. Museum, Vol. 53,
pp. 471‒488, August, 1917). An interesting account of the various groups
and subgenera is followed by descriptions of forty-two new species.
The name Pictoscala is proposed for a section, type _Scalaria lineata_
Say.
* * * * *
STUDIES ON AUSTRALIAN MOLLUSCA. PT. XIII. By C. Hedley (Proc. Linn. Soc.
New South Wales, 1916, vol. 41, pt. 4, pp. 680‒719, pls. 46‒52, issued
April 4, 1917). The author’s notes under _Tridacna gigantea_ Perry are
of such general interest that we quote them in part. “Under the name of
_Chama gigas_ the father of Natural History seems to have embraced the
whole of the modern genus _Tridacna_. For the name _gigas_, as
restricted to a single species, the candidates are the shell
subsequently named _squamosa_ by Lamarck and a huge species whose valves
in the Ulrica Museum, together weighed 498 pounds.
“After careful examination, Hanley decided that the furbelowed clam,
such as Reeve has figured for _T. squamosa_, ought rightly to bear the
name _gigas_. He based his verdict on the ground that the actual shell
owned by Linné as representing _gigas_, is the Lamarckian _squamosa_,
and that to this apply most of the literary references. Linnean
contemporaries such as Born, Regenfuss and Chemnitz, while making casual
references to the giant, all agree in figuring and describing _squamosa_
as the Linnean _gigas_.
“Discriminating in 1819 between the species his predecessors had
confused, Lamarck unlawfully used the name _gigas_ for the largest form,
while for the Linnean _gigas_ he proposed _squamosa_. Attentive to the
remarks of Hanley, Hidalgo in 1903, renamed the biggest species _T.
lamarcki_. But in 1811, Perry had already used the name _Chama gigantea_
for ‘the largest shell at present known.’ As the young of the giant has
not yet been traced to the adult, it is still possible that _squamosa_
is a juvenile deeper-water form of the large intertidal and abraded
_gigantea_.
“The heaviest known are a pair weighing 550 lbs., which Cuvier and
Lamarck relate were presented by the Venetian Republic to Francis I.
These still exist, their edges bound with brass, as holy-water basins in
the cathedral of St. Sulpice, in Paris.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account