The Navy of the American Revolution : $b Its administration, its policy, and its achievementsPaullin, Charles Oscar
History
The Navy of the American Revolution : $b Its administration, its policy, and its achievements
Paullin, Charles Oscar
United States -- History -- Revolution, 1775-1783 -- Naval operations; United States. Navy -- History -- Revolution, 1775-1783
[256] Marine Committee Letter Book, Board of Admiralty to Board of
Treasury, January 7, 1780.
[257] Ibid., Board of Admiralty, to Commissary-General of Issues,
August 21, 1780.
[258] Ibid., Board of Admiralty to Holker, August 29, 1780.
[259] Records and Papers of New London Country Historical Society,
part IV, I, 47-56; Boston Gazette, July 24, 1780; Gomer Williams,
Liverpool Privateers, 272-75.
[260] List of Officers in Revolutionary Navy, miscellaneous
manuscripts in the Library of Congress.
[261] See Chapter VIII, Secretary of Marine and Agent of Marine.
[262] Journals of Continental Congress, July 9, 1781.
[263] Records and Papers of Continental Congress, 78, XIV, 445-47.
[264] Journals of Continental Congress, July 17, 1781.
[265] Ibid., July 18, 1781.
CHAPTER VIII
THE SECRETARY OF MARINE AND THE AGENT OF MARINE
On the question of the proper organization of the executive
departments, the leaders of the Revolution were divided into
two factions. Moved by their love of liberty, their distrust of
governments, and their jealousy of delegated and concentrated
powers, the members of one faction favored the vesting of the
executive business in Congressional committees. The members of the
other faction, who stood for governmental authority and control,
for constructive legislation in the field of administration, and
for the application of the principles of business to the affairs
of state, declared for a system of permanent and single-headed
executives chosen outside of the membership of Congress. The issue
that was here joined in the special field of administration was
of course a part of that perennial and perpetual conflict between
the freedom of the individual and social control. In this case, as
everywhere and always, the political doctrinaires, the iconoclasts
and radicals, and the men of heart rather than of head, lined up on
the side of liberty; while the practical and conservative men, the
representatives of vested interests, and the cold, logical thinkers,
stood together on the side of governmental control.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account