The Navy of the American Revolution : $b Its administration, its policy, and its achievementsPaullin, Charles Oscar
History
The Navy of the American Revolution : $b Its administration, its policy, and its achievements
Paullin, Charles Oscar
United States -- History -- Revolution, 1775-1783 -- Naval operations; United States. Navy -- History -- Revolution, 1775-1783
On April 17 the New York Committee of Safety issued commissions
to Captain William Rodgers of the “Montgomery,” Captain James
Smith of the “General Schuyler,” and Captain Thomas Cregier of the
“General Putnam.” Rather singularly, these captains executed bonds
in favor of John Hancock, President of the Continental Congress,
and were given the commissions of Continental privateers. The naval
establishment of New York was a mixed one. Her fleet was governed by
the Continental naval rules and regulations. The enlisting contract
of the “Montgomery” reads at points as if the vessel belonged to the
Continental Congress: “The said William Rogers, for and in behalf of
himself and the said Thirteen Colonies of North America, doth hereby
covenant and agree to and with said officers, seamen, and marines” to
advance a month’s wages. In sharing prizes, in granting bounties to
wounded soldiers, and in rewarding exceptional merit, the contract
followed the naval regulations of the Continental Congress.[652] On
the other hand, the three vessels were owned, fitted out, officered,
and manned by New York, which state directed their cruises, and paid
their officers and seamen. This mixed establishment may in part be
explained by the fact that at first New York’s intention was to have
Congress take her vessels into the Continental service.[653]
On the evacuation of Boston by the British on March 17, 1776,
Washington at once proceeded to New York, whither, it is recollected,
the scene of war soon shifted. In April Washington asked for the
loan of the New York vessels to assist in the defence of New York
city. After some disagreement as to the terms upon which he should
receive them, the “General Putnam” and the “General Schuyler” were
turned over to him.[654] Hereafter the state seems not to have had
the direction of the “General Schuyler.” In October, 1776, a mutiny
having occurred on board the “General Putnam,” the New York Committee
of Safety ordered this vessel to be sold.[655]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account