The Navy of the American Revolution : $b Its administration, its policy, and its achievementsPaullin, Charles Oscar
History
The Navy of the American Revolution : $b Its administration, its policy, and its achievements
Paullin, Charles Oscar
United States -- History -- Revolution, 1775-1783 -- Naval operations; United States. Navy -- History -- Revolution, 1775-1783
New Hampshire’s only naval undertaking was her participation, at the
suggestion of Massachusetts, in the Penobscot expedition of July,
1779. She contributed to the ill-starred fleet the “Hampden,” 22,
Captain Titus Salter, which vessel was captured by the British.[661]
On July 3, 1776, New Hampshire passed an act “to encourage the fixing
out of Armed Vessels to defend the seacoast of America, and to cruise
on the enemies of the United Colonies, as also for erecting a court
to try and condemn all Ships and other Vessels.” This act was modeled
on similar acts of Massachusetts. It established state privateering.
A “Court Maritime,” consisting of one judge, was erected at
Portsmouth to try cases of capture. Salvage was prescribed in
accordance with the proportions fixed by the Continental Congress.
In cases of prizes captured by a Continental vessel, appeals lay from
the Court Maritime to the Continental Congress.[662]
In July, 1776, a Committee of Newark, New Jersey, requested the New
Jersey Provincial Congress to build four “gondolas,” or row-galleys,
to be mounted with cannon, and to ply between the mouths of the
Passaic and Hackensack rivers and the town of Perth Amboy. The
Provincial Congress referred the proposition to a committee of
four. It finally ended the business by referring the report of this
committee to the Continental Congress.[663]
Until October 5, 1776, when New Jersey passed an act establishing
an admiralty court, her Provincial Congress decided prize cases. So
early as February 15, 1776, a committee of the Provincial Congress,
which had been appointed to draft an ordinance for erecting a Court
of Admiralty, reported that it had consulted William Livingston,
one of the New Jersey delegates to the Continental Congress, on the
subject, and had proposed to him, whether it would not be of manifest
advantage to the Colonies if “Congress should, by one general
ordinance, institute the powers and mode of erecting a Court of
Admiralty to be adopted by all the Colonies.” Livingston agreed to
take the first opportunity for proposing the matter to Congress.[664]
Nothing came of the recommendation.
FOOTNOTES:
[634] Acts and Resolves of Rhode Island, June, 1775.
[635] Staples, Annals of Providence, 265.
[636] Force, American Archives, 4th, III, 69.
[637] Ibid., 36-37, 461, 653; Collections of Rhode Island Historical
Society, VI, 134-35; see Chapter I, page 55.
[638] Acts and Resolves of Rhode Island, August, 1775.
[639] Providence Gazette, April 20, April 27, 1776; Acts and Resolves
of Rhode Island, November, December, 1776; Arnold, History of Rhode
Island, II, 397.
[640] Rhode Island Colonial Records, VII, 582.
[641] Acts and Resolves of Rhode Island, December, 1776, May, 1778.
[642] Acts and Resolves of Rhode Island, March, May, 1776.
[643] W. P. Sheffield, Rhode Island Privateers and Privateersmen.
[644] Acts and Resolves of Rhode Island, June, 1777.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account