The Negro and the elective franchise. A series of papers and a sermonGrimké, Archibald Henry
Philosophy
The Negro and the elective franchise. A series of papers and a sermon
Grimké, Archibald Henry
African Americans -- Suffrage
⁴ The requirement that the voter be able to read (or write) _and_
interpret satisfactorily, in the Virginia registration requirement
before Jan. 1, 1904, is an advance upon the earlier clauses, which
left the alternative. I am not sure but that it reappears in the
Maryland law not yet in operation. It is an interesting fact that
it was _Senator Daniels of Virginia_ who once called the attention
of the Senate to the injustice done the South by Senator Spooner’s
assertion that voters were, without alternative, required to
interpret passages from the Constitutions.
Yet disfranchisement for ignorance, for thriftlessness, and vice all
together are acknowledged to be insufficient, and resort must be had
again to manipulation, juggling, and confessed dishonesty. Rev. Edgar
Gardiner Murphy, Executive Secretary of the Southern Education Board, a
distinguished witness, testifying against interest, says: "The
instrument of discrimination has been found in the discretionary powers
lodged in the board of registrars, by which worthy Negro men, fairly
meeting every test of suffrage have been excluded from registration."(?)
Where the fact is so freely admitted, proof seems wasted, yet abundant
corroboration may easily be had⁵.
⁵ The following clipping from the Baltimore American, I cannot
refrain from reading:—
"In the recent election the democratic judges of election in many
of the counties proved that they were unable even to count ballots
properly marked, and when it came to putting a reasonable
interpretation on the intention of a voter they were either wholly
ignorant or wholly dishonest. It is perfectly safe to say that not
one-third of the democratic judges who served at the Maryland
election of last week could themselves give an intelligent
interpretation of any section in the Constitution. Many of them do
not even know what the Constitution is, and the man who suggested
that they would take it to be a new kind of drink did not overshoot
the mark. Fine professors of constitutional history these men would
make!"
The fact as well as the extent of disfranchisement is revealed by the
statistical summaries:—
*STATISTICAL SUMMARIES*
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account