Municipalities usually supplemented the laws of the state with special
regulations of their own. The Board of Commissioners of Nashville, June
7, 1805,
Resolved, That it shall be the duty of the town sergeant to
inspect each slave he may discover trading in town, and require
of them a permit from their master or mistress, or the person
under whose care they are, specifying the commodity which they
may have for sale. And if such slave has no permit, the town
sergeant shall immediately seize on the commodity he may have
for sale, and take it with the slave before some justice of
the peace, and make oath that such slave had transgressed the
by-laws for the regulation of the town in the manner above
described. The town sergeant shall then immediately expose
to sale such commodity to the highest bidder for cash at the
market house; one-half of the amount of such sales to go to the
use of the town, and the other half to the use of the sergeant
for his services.[127]
Traffic with slaves was very important for several reasons. The slave had
very little sense of value, in the first place. He frequently exchanged
the most valuable farm products for a pittance in order to obtain money
with which to gamble or buy whiskey. The liquor traffic still more
vitally touched the life of the plantation. An intoxicated slave was
not only incapacitated, but he was inclined to raise trouble with other
slaves. This might end in slaves being killed or an insurrection. Again,
the element of society that engaged in the liquor traffic with slaves
was usually the poor whites, free negroes, or mulattoes, who were opposed
to slavery and did not hesitate to propagate ideas of insurrection and
freedom among slaves. The best way to keep slaves happy and contented
and, consequently, efficient, was to have complete severance of relations
between them and outsiders. Finally, it is noticed that traffic with
slaves, in all its ramifications, seriously endangered property interests.
E. _Insurrections._
No one was permitted to speak disrespectfully of the owner in a slave’s
presence, or to use language of an insurrectionary nature.[128] Words in
favor of emancipation, rebellion, or conspiracy came under this head. The
penalty was a fine of $10, one-half to the county and the other to the
reporter.
A person knowingly aiding in circulating any printed matter that fostered
discontent or insubordination among slaves or free persons of color,
was guilty of felony, and might suffer an imprisonment of ten years for
first offense and twenty for the second.[129] The same punishment was
prescribed for addresses, or sermons of an inflammatory nature.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account