The Conference of 1817 dealt very extensively with slavery.[38] It
made provision for the buying and selling of slaves. It prohibited
the selling of slaves into perpetual bondage on penalty of forfeiture
of membership in the church. The quarterly conference was given the
power to regulate the term of slavery for which a member of the church
could sell his slave. The preacher of each congregation was empowered
to appoint a committee of three to judge of the length of service
that slaves purchased by members could be required to render. All of
these requirements were conditioned on practicability, the consent of
the state, violation of justice and mercy, and assumption of financial
responsibility against charge of emancipated slaves. The conditions
of the execution of these regulations show what a travesty the whole
procedure was.
The case of Hardy M. Cryer, which came before the conference of 1817,
illustrates the difficulty that the church faced in trying to enforce
its policy. Mr. Cryer was secretary of the conference of 1817. He had
failed to emancipate his slaves according to a promise made the previous
conference. He had in the meantime bought a negro boy. He was able to
make satisfactory explanation of his conduct to the conference, and was
appointed elder. In other words, he was able to show the conference that
his conduct had been consistent with “justice and mercy” and that its
requirements as to emancipation were “impracticable.”[39]
One of the most eminent of Tennessee historians made the following
comment on the action of the church in the conference of 1817:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account