Of comets, the Old Astronomy knew that they came to the sun from great
distances in all directions, and in calculable orbits; but as to
_what_ they were, this, even in the childhood of those of us who are
middle-aged, was as little known as to the centuries during which they
still from their horrid heads shook pestilence and war. We do not know
even now by any means exactly what they are, for enough yet remains to
be learned about them still to give their whole study the attraction
which belongs to the unknown; and yet we learn so much, and in a way
which to our grandfathers would have been so unexpected, connecting
together the comet, the shooting star, and the meteorite, that the
astronomer who perhaps speaks with most authority about these to-day
was able, not long ago, in beginning a lecture, to state that he held
in his hand what had been a part of a comet; and what he held was,
not something half vaporous or gaseous, as we might suppose from our
old associations, but a curious stone like this on page 203, which,
with others, had fallen from the sky in Iowa, a flashing prodigy, to
the terror of barking dogs, shying horses, and fearful men, followed
by clouds of smoke and vapor, and explosions that shook the houses
like an earthquake, and “hollow bellowings and rattling sounds mingled
with clang and clash and roar,” as an auditor described it. It is only
a fragment of a larger stone which may have weighed tons. It looks
inoffensive enough now, and its appearance affords no hint of the
commotion it caused in a peaceable neighborhood only ten years ago. But
what, it may be asked, is the connection between such things and comets?
To answer this, let us recall the statement that the orbit of the
November meteor swarm has been computed; which means that those flying
bodies have been found to come only from one particular quarter out
of all possible quarters, at one particular angle out of all possible
angles, at one particular velocity out of all possible velocities, and
so on; so that the chances are endless against mere accident producing
another body which agreed in all these particulars, and others besides.
Now, in 1867 the remarkable fact was established that a comet seen in
the previous year (Comet 1, 1866) had the same orbit as the meteoroids,
which implies, as we have just seen, that the comet and the meteors
were in some way closely related.
The paths of the August meteors and of the Lyrids also have both been
found to agree closely with those of known comets, and there is other
evidence which not only connects the comets and the shooting stars, and
makes it probable that the latter are due to some disintegration of the
former, but even looks as though the process were still going on. And
now with this in mind we may, perhaps, look at these drawings with more
interest.
[Illustration: FIG. 80.--COMET OF DONATI, SEPT. 16, 1858.[7]]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account