[7] The five engravings of the Comet of Donati are from “Annals
of the Astronomical Observatory of Harvard College.”
We have all seen a comet, and we have all felt, perhaps, something of
the awe which is called up by the thought of its immensity and its rush
through space like a runaway star. Its head is commonly like a small
luminous point, from which usually grows as it approaches the sun a
relatively enormous brush or tail of pale light, which has sometimes
been seen to stretch across the whole sky from zenith to horizon. It
is useless to look only along the ecliptic road for a comet’s coming;
rather may we expect to see it rushing down from above, or up from
below, sometimes with a speed which is possibly greater than it
could get from any fall--not so much, that is, the speed of a body
merely dropping toward the sun by its weight, as that of a missile
hurled into the orderly solar system from some unknown source without,
and also associated with some unknown power; for while it is doubtful
whether gravity is sufficient to account for the velocity of all
comets, it seems certain that gravity can in no way explain some of the
phenomena of their tails.
[Illustration: FIG. 81.--“A PART OF A COMET.”]
Thousands of comets have been seen since the Christian era, and the
orbits of hundreds have been calculated since the time of Newton.
Though they may describe any conic section, and though most orbits
are spoken of as parabolas, this is rather a device for the analyst’s
convenience than the exact representation of fact. Without introducing
more technical language, it will be enough to say here that we learn
in other cases from the form of the orbit whether the body is drawn
essentially by the sun’s gravity, or whether it has been thrown into
the system by some power beyond the sun’s control, to pass away again,
out of that control, never to return. It must be admitted, however,
that though several orbits are so classed, there is not any one known
to be beyond doubt of this latter kind, while we are certain that many
comets, if not all, are erratic members of the solar family, coming
back again after their excursions, at regular, though perhaps enormous,
intervals.
But what we have just been saying belongs rather to the province of
the Old Astronomy than the New, which concerns itself more with the
nature and appearance of the heavenly bodies than the paths they travel
on. Perhaps the best way for us to look at comets will be to confine
our attention at first to some single one, and to follow it from its
earliest appearance to its last, by the aid of pictures, and thus
to study, as it were, the species in the individual. The difficulty
will be one which arises from the exquisitely faint and diaphanous
appearance of the original, which no ordinary care can possibly render,
though here the reader has had done for him all that the wood-engraver
can do.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account