Very little indeed was added to the early observations of Fabricius and
Galileo until a time within the remembrance of many of us; for it is
since the advent of the generation now on the stage that nine-tenths of
the knowledge of the subject has been reached.
Let us first take a general view of the sun, and afterward study it
in detail. What we see with a good telescope in this general view is
something like this. Opposite are three successive views (Figs. 2, 3,
4) taken on three successive days,--quite authentic portraits, since
the sun himself made them; they being, in fact, projected telescopic
images which have been fixed for us by photography, and then exactly
reproduced by the engraver. The first was taken (by Mr. Rutherfurd, of
New York) on the 20th of September, 1870, when a remarkably large spot
had come into view. It is seen here not far from the eastern edge (the
left hand in the engraving), and numerous other spots are also visible.
The reader should notice the position of these, and then on turning to
the next view (Fig. 3, taken on September 22d) he will see that they
have all shifted their places, by a common motion toward the west. The
great spot on the left has now got well into view, and we can see its
separate parts; the group which was on the left of the centre has got
a little to the right of it, and so on. From the common motion of them
all, we might suspect that the sun was turning round on an axis like
the earth, carrying the spots with it; and as we continue to observe,
this suspicion becomes certainty. In the third view (Fig. 4), taken on
September 26th, the spot we first saw on the left has travelled more
than half across the disk, while others we saw on September 20th have
approached to the right-hand edge or passed wholly out of sight behind
it. The sun does rotate, then, but in twenty-five or twenty-six of
our days,--I say twenty-five _or_ twenty-six, because (what is very
extraordinary) it does not turn all-of-a-piece like the earth, but some
parts revolve faster than others,--not only faster in feet and inches,
but in the number of turns,--just as though the rim of a carriage wheel
were to make more revolutions in a mile than the spokes, and the spokes
more than the hub. Of course no solid wheel could so turn without
wrenching itself in pieces, but that the great solar wheel does, is
incontestable; and this alone is a convincing proof that the sun’s
surface is not solid, but liquid or gaseous.
[Illustration: FIG. 7.--SEPT. 21, 1870.]
[Illustration: FIG. 8.--SEPT. 22, 1870.]
But let us return to the great spot which we saw coming round the
eastern edge. Possibly the word “great” may seem misapplied to what was
but the size of a pin-head in the first engraving, but we must remember
that the disk of the sun there shown is in reality over 800,000 miles
in diameter. We shall soon see whether this spot deserves to be called
“great” or not.
[Illustration: FIG. 9.--SEPT. 23, 1870.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account