The New Forest: Its History and Its SceneryWise, John R. (John Richard)
History
The New Forest: Its History and Its Scenery
Wise, John R. (John Richard)
New Forest (England : Forest)
[20]For the sake of brevity, let me add that William of Malmesbury
(_Gesta Regum Anglorum_, vol. ii. p. 455, published by the English
Historical Society, 1840), Henry of Huntingdon (_Historiarum_, lib.
vi., in Savile’s _Rerum Anglicarum Scriptores_, p. 371), Simon of
Durham (_De Gestis Regum Anglorum_, in the _Historiæ Anglicanæ
Scriptores Decem_, p. 225), copying word for word from Florence,
Roger Hoveden (_Annalium Pars Prior, Willielmus Junior_, in the
_Rerum Anglicarum Scriptores_, p. 468), Roger of Wendover (_Flores
Historiarum_, vol. ii. pp. 25, 26, published by the English
Historical Society), Walter Hemingburgh (_De Gestis Regum Angliæ_,
vol. i. p. 33, published by the English Historical Society), and
John Ross (_Historia Regum Angliæ_, pp. 112, 113. Ed. Hearne.
Oxford, 1716), repeat, according to their different degrees of
accuracy, the general story of the Conqueror destroying villages and
exterminating the inhabitants.
[21]_The Chronicle._ Ed. Thorpe, as before quoted. Nor does the writer,
when another opportunity presents itself at Rufus’s death, mention
the matter, but passes it over in significant silence. The same
volume, p. 364.
[22]See _Domesday_ (the photo-zincographed fac-simile of the part
relating to Hampshire; published at the Ordnance Survey Office,
1861), p. xxix. b, under Bertramelei, Pistelslai, Odetune, Oxelei,
&c.
[23]See in _Domesday_, as before, p. xxvii. b, the entry under
Langelei—“Aluric Petit tenet unam virgatam in Forestâ.” See, too, p.
iii. b, under Edlinges.
[24]See in _Domesday_, under Thuinam, Holeest, Slacham, Rinwede, p. iv.
a; and Herdel, p. xxviii. b.
[25]See in _Domesday_, out of many instances, Esselei and Suei, p. xxix.
b; Bailocheslei, p. xiv. b; Wolnetune and Bedeslei, p. xxviii. a;
Hentune, p. xxviii. b; and Linhest, p. iv. a.
[26]It is possible that whilst the survey was being taken Saulf died. If
this be so, we find an instance of feeling in allowing his widow to
still rent the lands at Hubborn, which could little have been
expected. The name seems to have been misspelt in various entries.
See _Domesday_, p. xxix. b, under Sanhest and Melleford.
[27]Aluric is probably the physician of that name mentioned in
_Domesday_, p. xxix. a, as holding land in the hundred of Egheiete.
Not to take up further space, let me here only notice some few out
of the many Old-English names of persons in _Domesday_ holding lands
in places which had been more or less afforested, such as Godric
(probably Godric Malf) at Wootton, Willac in the hundred of
Egheiete, Uluric at Godshill, in the actual Forest, and Wislac at
Oxley. See _Domesday_ under the words Odetune, Godes-manes-camp, and
Oxelei, p. xxix. b. See, also, under Totintone, p. xxvii. a, where
Agemund and Alric hold lands which the former, and the latter’s
father, had held of Edward.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account