The New Forest: Its History and Its SceneryWise, John R. (John Richard)
History
The New Forest: Its History and Its Scenery
Wise, John R. (John Richard)
New Forest (England : Forest)
[28]Passing over the later and more highly-coloured accounts, we will
content ourselves with Florence of Worcester, as more trustworthy,
whose words are—“Antiquis enim temporibus, Edwardi scilicet Regis,
et aliorum Angliæ Regum predecessorum ejus, hæc regio incolis Dei et
ecclesiis nitebat uberrime.” (Thorpe’s edition, as before quoted.)
Were this, even in a limited degree, true, the Forest would present
the strange anomaly of possessing more churches then than it does
now, with a great increase of population. The _Domesday_ census, we
may add, makes the inhabitants of that portion which is called “In
Novâ Forestâ et circa eam,” a little over two hundred. See Ellis’s
_Introduction to Domesday_, vol. ii. p. 450.
[29]In support of these statements, I may quote from the Prize Essay on
the Farming of Hampshire, published in the _Journal of the Royal
Agricultural Society of England_ (vol. xxii., part ii., No. 48,
1861), and which was certainly not written with any view to
historical evidence, but simply from an agricultural point. At pp.
242, 243, the author says: “The outlying New Forest block consists
of more recent and unprofitable deposits. This tract appears to the
ordinary observer, at first sight, to be a mixed mass of clays,
marls, sands, and gravels. The apparent confusion arises from the
variety of the strata, from the confined space in which they are
deposited, and from the manner in which, on the numerous hills and
knolls, they overlie one another, or are concealed by drift gravel.”
And again, at pp. 250, 251, he continues: “Of the Burley Walk, the
part to the west of Burley Beacon, and round it, is nothing but sand
or clay growing rushes, with here and there some ‘bed furze.’... The
Upper Bagshots, about Burley Beacon, round by Rhinefield and Denney
Lodges, and so on towards Fawley, are hungry sands devoid of
staple:” and finally sums up by saying, “half of the 63,000 acres
are not worth 1_s._ 6_d._ an acre,” p. 330.
[30]In that portion under “In Novâ Forestâ et circa eam.”
[31]Warner, vol. ii. p. 33, says Hordle Church was standing when
_Domesday_ was made. This is a mistake. It was, however, built soon
after, as we know from some grants of Baldwin de Redvers.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account