Germany -- History -- Revolution, 1918; Germany -- Politics and government -- 1918-1933
The other difficulty is the Treaty's formlessness and its want of
design. A careful comparison of the articles and their appendices
suggests that the essential policy of the whole is a compromise
between, or rather a cobbling together of, two contradictory points of
view, the French and the Anglo-Saxon; while in its externals it is an
attempt to camouflage European Imperialism with American Idealism.
In the Jehad we have just fought against Germany, the low material
object of the French was to extirpate; while that of the English was
rather to enslave. The high moral object of the French was to rescue
Alsace-Lorraine; the high moral object of the English was to protect
Belgium. Consequently, reading the Treaty is something like reading
the Koran. The mind cannot get the point of view or purpose. It loses
itself in dicta, as determinative in detail for the weal or woe of
mankind as they are disconnected in themselves and dissociated from
any general doctrine, or even from any especial dogma. One soon gives
up trying to grasp the Treaty. And one puts it aside with the
consoling thought that "the Koran or the Sword" is good enough for
those who, like the Huns, are not "people of the Law"; and that
everything depends on the "idjra," the "interpretative effort" of
future pundits.
There is something tragic about such petty killings and cruelties as
those ordained by the sinister reactionaries of the Eden Hotel in
Berlin. But there is something ludicrous about the miseries and
murders _en masse_ organised by the highly respectable reactionaries
of the Hotel Majestic. It is as though we:--
had resolved to extirpate the vipers
With twenty Balliol men and forty lady typers.
On the morning of that Thursday in May, the German reading public took
up its morning paper with a sigh of relief that the long suspense was
ended--and dropped it again with a gasp of despair. But Germany wore
its rue with a difference. The opposition to the Treaty was of two
kinds. The original split of the Independent idealists with the
Majoritarian real-politikers had been over foreign policy--first in
the prosecution of the war, then in the preparation for peace. These
Independents condemned such crimes as the U-boat war and the military
murders of Miss Cavell and Captain Fryatt, uncompromisingly. Their
main reason for leaving the Coalition Socialist Government in
December was that they could not get their liberal policy carried in
respect either of Poland and the Baltic provinces, or as to a frank
recognition of responsibility for the war and full reparation to
France and Belgium.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account