Germany -- History -- Revolution, 1918; Germany -- Politics and government -- 1918-1933
If this is so, and the course of recent events tends to confirm a
conjecture made soon after my arrival in Germany, then a
centralisation that tends to maintain Prussian hegemony in Germany is
not in principle objectionable. It remains to be seen whether the
Constitution as now recentralised offers opportunities to a
recrudescence of Prussianism in the bad sense.
The position of Prussia, having four-sevenths of the population, an even
larger proportion of the ruling class and of the military caste, also
the capital and the civil service, was the main difficulty of the
Constitution-makers. The revolutionary solution was at first the
partition of Prussia, and it seemed feasible enough. Prussian unity had
centred more than that of any other German State in the Crown; and as
the Prussian Revolution had three main distinct regions, not very
different from the old racial divisions, a division of the State into
three seemed as easy as expedient. Dr. Preuss and constitutional jurists
of all parties stood in favour of such partition. At the same time, if
Prussia were to be partitioned, obviously a rearrangement of the other
States might be attempted, so as to give the new German Constitution
that uniformity and precision so precious to the German mind.
Accordingly, all manner of fancy schemes were put forward by which the
Reich was divided geographically, racially, religiously, economically,
and even industrially. But all the time the Revolution, that alone
could have carried through any such reconstruction, was being thwarted
and throttled, so that none of these schemes became practical politics.
The revolutionary impetus that the Constitution-makers could use for the
realisation of their reconstructive ideals proved far too weak. There
were, however, plenty of interested efforts to abolish the anomalies and
absurdities of the old dynastic frontiers. Thus Hamburg merchants wished
to annex Bremen; Brunswick revolutionaries wished to annex Anhalt;
Coburg councils declared their independence of Gotha councils; Waldeck
burghers clamoured for release from the tyranny of Pyrmont. But when it
came to effecting any such change, in no case was there sufficient
support. It would indeed have been easier to redivide Germany on
altogether new lines than to partition up and patch together the old
States. Dr. Preuss was, at a very early stage, obliged to restrict
himself to laying down principles for procedure which should make
subsequent rearrangements as easy as possible; and he was eventually
obliged to content himself with putting, as he himself said, the least
possible obstacle in the way of change.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account