Germany -- History -- Revolution, 1918; Germany -- Politics and government -- 1918-1933
The great strength of Prussianism was in the Prussian Constitution and
in the Crown. But Art. 17 now prescribes that every State must have a
Constitution as a Free State of a democratic character. And as to the
Crown, Prussia has not the same relations to the President as it had
to the Emperor. The Kaiser was primarily King of Prussia by right
divine, the President is primarily executive of Germany by popular
election.[L] Moreover, under the old _régime_, the Kaiser's Chancellor
was also Prussian Premier. The Republic's Chancellor has nothing to
say to Prussia; he and the Ministers form a Federal Cabinet
responsible to the Reichstag.
And, if we carry this comparison into other political regions, we find
the same result; that Prussianism and Junkerism have lost their
vantage grounds and have been put under democratic control.
In Foreign Affairs the influence of Prussia was, as we have cause to
know, especially fatal to Germany and to Europe. But that is now at an
end. The German Constitution not only affords the usual guarantees of
Parliamentary Government for a democratic foreign policy, but guards
the nation against defects in those guarantees that have been found
dangerous even in our own Constitution. Two innovations have for years
been urged by reformers in our own country, the institution of a
permanent parliamentary committee on foreign affairs, and the
submission of important treaties, as well as of declaration of war, to
Parliament. Had Germany had these safeguards at the time of the war
there would have been no war. Had we had them then we should now have
peace. Articles 35 and 45 of the German Constitution are worthy of our
careful consideration.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account