Eddington has speculated in a most interesting way on this possible
source of stellar heat in his recent presidential address before the
British Association for the Advancement of Science (see _Nature_,
September 2, 1920). He points out that the old contraction hypothesis,
according to which the source of solar and stellar heat was supposed
to reside in the slow condensation of a radiating mass of gas under
the action of gravity, is wholly inadequate to explain the observed
phenomena. If the old view were correct, the earlier history of
a star, from the giant stage of a cool and diaphanous gas to the
period of highest temperature, would be run through within eighty
thousand years, whereas we have the best of evidence that many
thousands of centuries would not suffice. Some other source of energy
is imperatively needed. If 5 per cent of a star's mass consists
originally of hydrogen atoms, which gradually combine in the slow
process of time to form more complex elements, the total heat thus
liberated would more than suffice to account for all demands, and
it would be unnecessary to assume the existence of any other source
of heat.
[Illustration: Fig. 40. Spiral nebula in Ursa Major (Ritchey).
Luminous matter, in every variety of physical and chemical state,
is available for study in the most diverse celestial objects, from
the spiral and irregular nebulae through all the types of stars.
Doctor van Maanen's measures of the Mount Wilson photographs indicate
outward motion along the arms of spiral nebulae, while the spectroscope
shows them to be whirling at enormous velocities.]
COSMIC PRESSURES
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account