The New OptimismStacpoole, H. De Vere (Henry De Vere)
Philosophy
The New Optimism
Stacpoole, H. De Vere (Henry De Vere)
Evolution; Faith; Social problems; Stacpoole, H. De Vere (Henry De Vere), 1863-1951 -- Philosophy
“She does want license, as a matter of fact; one would be blind who
looked at her programme and did not see that.
“And the license she wants is not the license to steal, or lie, or
murder, or commit arson. When she talks of forming her own morals, she
has one morality entirely and solely in view—the morality that presides
over Love; and when she asks for license, it is license in Love.
“Men have more license in this matter than women. That is undoubtedly
so.
“Men, since the beginning of the world, have had more license than
women; but that license is a relic of barbarism. It was useful once,
but it is becoming less useful every day, and _pari passu_ men are
becoming more moral.”
“Useful once?”
“In this way. Men in the past were the fertilisers of the world. Who
brought Roman blood to England, Norman blood, Norse blood? Men. Roman,
Norman, and Norse women had nothing to do with the matter. Their duty
was to stay at home and be moral. Armed and roaming men fertilised the
world, just as bees fertilise a field of clover, crossed the races, and
made the vitality of them.
“Roman, Norse, and Norman virtues that make England great were born
of Roman, Norse, and Norman license. The same fact applies to all
Europe. But the day of the free-lance in love is gone. He who was once
a world-maker is now a world-curse. He is not now a world-maker, but a
Home-wrecker and a woman-wrecker.
“Nations no longer require him for a fertiliser. Men no longer travel
in masses, armed with spears; they go in railway carriages, accompanied
by their families, and the world can get all the fertilisation it wants
by immigration.
“License still lives among men, but it lives as a reptile; among men
it is dying, yet Feminists, when they ask for license, would give this
dying thing a new birth among women. They forget that what was once a
bad necessity is now a hideous and dying superfluity.
[Sidenote: The Right of Motherhood]
“I have heard it stated by Feminists that motherhood is the right of
every woman.
“So is fatherhood the right of every man, and on that plea a man might
base a very wide scheme of immorality.
“As a matter of fact, there is something else: the right of the child.
“A woman has _no_ right to motherhood unless she can provide a home for
her child. A father has no right to fatherhood who cannot do likewise.
And by a home I do not mean shelter and food; I mean everything sacred
that lies in that word Home. Love, affection, self-restraint, mutual
respect, and family respect.
“Of course, if the Feminist says, Destroy the home, one has nothing
more to say. She is logical.
“But to say, I shall increase license among women without injuring or
destroying the home, at once reduces her to a person who is not logical.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account