The new state : $b Group organization the solution of popular governmentFollett, Mary Parker
Science
The new state : $b Group organization the solution of popular government
Follett, Mary Parker
Democracy; Political participation; Social psychology; State, The
This idea must be carefully worked out: we can take each so-called
“sovereign power” which we are thinking of “delegating” to a League of
Nations and we can see that that delegating does not make us individual
nations less “sovereign” and less “free” but more so—it is the Great
Paradox of our time. The object of every proper “cession” of sovereignty
is to make us freer than ever before. Is it to be “sovereign” and “free”
for nations suspiciously and fearfully to keep sleepless watch on one
another while they build ship for ship, plane for plane? Have England
and Germany been proudly conscious of their “freedom” when thinking of
Central Africa? When the individual nations give up their separate
sovereignty—as regards their armaments, as regards the control of the
regions which possess the raw materials, as regards the great waterways
of the world, as regards, in fact, all which affects their joint
lives—the falling chains of a real slavery will reverberate through the
world. For unrelated sovereignty, with world conditions as they are
to-day, is slavery.
The idea of “sovereign” nations must go as completely as is disappearing
the idea of sovereign individuals. The isolation of sovereign nations is
so utterly complete that they cannot really (and I mean this literally)
even see each other. The International League is the one solution for
the relation of nations. Whenever we say we can have a “moral”
international law on any other basis, we write ourselves down pure
sentimentalists.
There are many corollaries to this project. We do not need, for
instance, a more vigorous protection of neutrals, but the abolition of
neutrals. The invasion of the rights of neutrals in this war by both
sides shows that we can no longer have neutrals in our scheme of union;
all must come within the bond.
Further, diplomatic relations will be entirely changed. “Honor among
thieves” means loyalty to your group: while to lie or to try to get the
better of your own particular group is an unpardonable offence, you may
deceive an outsider. We see now the psychological reason for this.
Diplomatic lying will not go until diplomatists instead of treating with
one another as members of alien groups consider themselves all as
members of one larger group—the League of Nations.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account