The New York Subway, Its Construction and EquipmentInterborough Rapid Transit Company
History
The New York Subway, Its Construction and Equipment
Interborough Rapid Transit Company
Local transit -- New York (State) -- New York; Subways -- New York (State) -- New York
Conservative signaling is all in favor of the overlap, on account of
the safety factor, in case the signal is accidentally overrun. Another
consideration was the use of automatic train stops. These stops are
placed at the home signals, and it is thus essential that a stopping
distance should be afforded in advance of the home signal to provide
for stopping the train to which the brake had been applied by the
automatic stop.
Ordinarily, the arrangement of overlap sections increases the length
of block sections by the length of the overlap, and as the length of
the section fixed the minimum spacing of trains, it was imperative to
make the blocks as short as consistent with safety, in order not to
cut down the carrying capacity of the railway. This led to a study of
the special problem presented by subway signaling and a development of
a blocking system upon lines which it is believed are distinctly in
advance of anything heretofore done in this direction.
[Illustration: REAR VIEW OF BLOCK SIGNAL POST, SHOWING TRANSFORMER AND
INSTRUMENT CASES WITH DOORS OPEN]
Block section lengths are governed by speed and interval between
trains. Overlap lengths are determined by the distance in which a
train can be stopped at a maximum speed. Usually the block section
length is the distance between signals, plus the overlap; but where
maximum traffic capacity is desired the block section length can be
reduced to the length of two overlaps, and this was the system adopted
for the Interborough. The three systems of blocking trains, with and
without overlaps, is shown diagramatically on page 143, where two
successive trains are shown at the minimum distances apart for
"clear" running for an assumed stopping distance of 800 feet. The
system adopted for the subway is shown in line "C," giving the least
headway of the three methods.
[Illustration: PNEUMATIC TRACK STOP, SHOWING STOP TRIGGER IN UPRIGHT
POSITION]
The length of the overlap was given very careful consideration by the
Interborough Rapid Transit Company, who instituted a series of tests
of braking power of trains; from these and others made by the
Pennsylvania Railroad Company, curves were computed so as to determine
the distance in which trains could be stopped at various rates of
speed on a level track, with corrections for rising and falling to
grades up to 2 per cent. Speed curves were then plotted for the trains
on the entire line, showing at each point the maximum possible speed,
with the gear ratio of the motors adopted. A joint consideration of
the speeds, braking efforts, and profile of the road were then used to
determine at each and every point on the line the minimum allowable
distance between trains, so that the train in the rear could be
stopped by the automatic application of the brakes before reaching a
train which might be standing at a signal in advance; in other words,
the length of the overlap section was determined by the local
conditions at each point.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account