The Newmarket, Bury, Thetford and Cromer Road: Sport and history on an East Anglian turnpike — John Shaqi
The Newmarket, Bury, Thetford and Cromer Road: Sport and history on an East Anglian turnpikeHarper, Charles G. (Charles George)
History
The Newmarket, Bury, Thetford and Cromer Road: Sport and history on an East Anglian turnpike
Harper, Charles G. (Charles George)
England -- Description and travel; England -- Social life and customs
Ogilby in 1675, when the first edition of his _Britannia_ was published,
mapped out the road to Newmarket as part of the Old North Road as far as
Puckeridge, and thence took it to Barley, Whittlesford, and Pampisford;
yet Charles II. is not found travelling that way. He occasionally went
by Epping, but chiefly through Waltham Cross and Hoddesdon, and thence
by an obscure route past the Rye House, Hunsdon Street, Widford, Much
Hadham, Hadham Ford, Patmore Heath, Stocking Pelham, Berden, Rickling
Church End, and into Newport by a lane still known locally as “London
Lane.” A house at Newport now known as “Nell Gwynne’s House,” and once
the “Horns” inn, was at that time a halting-place often used by Nell,
the Duke of York, the Duke of Buckingham, and the Earl of Rochester on
their way to or from Newmarket races.
The very remoteness and obscurity of this route gave the conspirators of
the Rye House Plot of 1683 their opportunity. Those plotters were not
the thorough-paced scoundrels historians would have us believe, but men
who, with a passionate hatred of Popish doctrines, and with a keen
recollection of the approximation to civil and religious liberty enjoyed
under the Commonwealth of more than twenty years earlier, viewed the
growing absolutism of Charles’s rule and the advances of Popery with
fear and rage. The King as a man, with his romantic story, his airy wit,
his genial cynicism and lack of affectation, has always commanded
affection, but as a ruler deserved hatred and contempt. The original
conspiracy was comparatively harmless, and cherished the idea of a
constitutional revolution. With dreamy eyes fixed upon the ideal of a
Utopian Republic, it included such visionaries as Algernon Sidney, Lord
William Russell, the Earls of Essex and Shaftesbury, John Hampden
(grandson of the patriot), and Lord Howard of Escrick.
But an inner circle of less distinguished but more desperate men formed
within this movement had other, and secret, designs. It was their
intention to place the Protestant Duke of Monmouth, Charles’s natural
son, upon the throne, and, as a preliminary, to “remove” the King. “No
one would kill me to make you king,” Charles had once said to his
brother James, Duke of York; but the intention of the Rye House
conspirators was to assassinate both. These physical-force men worked
long and silently, without the knowledge of the others. At their head
was one Rumbold, a maltster, a colonel in Cromwell’s army, and with him
Walcot, a brother officer in those old times. Rumbold was the occupier
of a farm, the Rye House, an ancient building whose walls ranged with
the narrow lane, miscalled a road, which ran—and still runs, as a
lane—along the sloppy valley of the river Lea. The house had been built
by a certain Andrew Ogard, who in the reign of Henry VI. had been
licensed to construct a fortified dwelling here. The beautiful
Gatehouse, in red brick, with picturesquely twisted chimneys and a fine
oriel window, yet remains.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account