The nights of Straparola, volume 1 [of 2]Straparola, Giovanni Francesco
History
The nights of Straparola, volume 1 [of 2]
Straparola, Giovanni Francesco
Fairy tales -- Italy; Tales -- Italy
The first edition of the first part of the “Piacevoli Notti” was
published at Venice in 1550, and of the second part in 1553. It would
appear that the author must have been alive in 1557, because, at the end
of the second part of the edition of that year,[2] there is a paragraph
setting forth the fact that the work was printed and issued “ad instanza
dell’ autore.” Some time before 1553 he seems to have been stung sharply
on account of some charges of plagiarism which were brought against him
by certain detractors, for in all the unmutilated editions of the
“Notti” published after that date there is to be found a short
introduction to the second part, in which he somewhat acrimoniously
throws back these accusations, and calls upon all “gratiose et amorevole
donne” to accept his explanations thereof, admitting at the same time
that these stories are not his own, but a faithful transcript of what he
heard told by the ten damsels in their pleasant assembly. La Monnoie, in
his preface to the French translation (ed. 1726), maintains that this
juggling with words can only be held to be an excuse on his part for
having borrowed the subject-matter for his fables and worked it into
shape after his own taste. “Il declare qu’il ne se les est jamais
attribuées, et se contente du mérite de les avoir fidèlement rapportées
d’après les dix damoiselles. Cela, comme tout bon entendeur le comprend,
ne signifie autre chose sinon qu’il avoit tiré d’ailleurs la matière de
ces Fables, mais qu’il leur avoit donné la forme.”
This contention of La Monnoie seems reasonable enough, but Grimm, in the
notes to “Kinder und Hausmärchen,” has fallen into the strange error of
treating Straparola’s apology as something grave and seriously meant,
and in the same sentence improves on his mistake by asserting that
Straparola took all the fairy tales from the mouths of the ten ladies.
“Von jenem Schmutz sind die Märchen[3] ziemlich frei, wie sie ohnehin
den besten Theil des ganzen Werkes ausmachen. Straparola hat sie, wie es
in der Vorrede zum zweiten Bande (vor der sechsten Nacht) heisst, aus
dem Munde zehn junger Fräulein aufgenommen und ausdrücklich erklärt,
dass sie nicht sein Eigenthum seien.”
The most reasonable explanation of this mistake lies in the assumption
that Grimm never saw the introduction to the second part at all. Indeed,
the fact that he often uses French spelling of the proper names suggests
that he may have worked from the French translation. Straparola makes no
distinction between fairy tales and others. His words are, “che le
piacevoli favole da me scritte, et in questo, et nell’ altro volumetto
raccolte non siano mie, ma da questo, et quello ladronescamente rubbate.
Io a dir il vero, il confesso, che non sono mie, e se altrimente
dicessi, me ne mentirei, ma ben holle fedelmente scritte secondo il modo
che furono da dieci damigelle nel concistorio raccontate.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account