The Nineteenth and Their Times: Being an Account of the Four Cavalry Regiments in the British Army That Have Borne the Number Nineteen and of the Campaigns in Which They Served — John Shaqi
The Nineteenth and Their Times: Being an Account of the Four Cavalry Regiments in the British Army That Have Borne the Number Nineteen and of the Campaigns in Which They ServedBiddulph, J. (John)
History
The Nineteenth and Their Times: Being an Account of the Four Cavalry Regiments in the British Army That Have Borne the Number Nineteen and of the Campaigns in Which They Served
Biddulph, J. (John)
Great Britain. Army. Cavalry. 19th Light Dragoons, 1786-1821; Great Britain. Army. Cavalry. 19th Regiment, 1759-1763; Great Britain. Army. Cavalry. 19th Regiment, 1779-1783; Great Britain. Army. Cavalry. 23rd Light Dragoons, 1781-1786; Great Britain. Army. Royal Hussars, 19th (Queen Alexandra's Own)
From the signing of the Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle (1748), to the
outbreak of the Seven Years’ War (1756), the peace, nominally
existing between England and France, was continually broken, out of
Europe, by both parties. In India, under the veil of alliance with
opposing Native Princes, war was actively prosecuted, and it was with
difficulty that British interests maintained a precarious footing
in that country. In North America, the French claimed the whole
continent, except the ill defined New England settlements along the
coast, and denied the right of the English to trade in the interior.
Keeping themselves in the background, they waged a bloody war against
the English settlers, by means of the Indians, whom they subsidized,
and whose disguise they often adopted. Both in the East and the West,
French officials were acting with the support and countenance of the
Court of Versailles, and the English officials on the spot were not
slow to retaliate when occasion offered. It was evident that a crisis
could not long be averted, but it was advantageous to the French to
postpone an open rupture as long as possible, while the French navy
was being strengthened. On the other hand, it was the interest of
England to hasten the rupture, when war was seen to be inevitable,
since the objects to be fought for were beyond the seas. The English
navy was, at that time, greatly superior in strength to the French
navy, while the French military forces were eight or ten times as
strong as the English army, which had been greatly reduced since the
conclusion of the late war. As time went on, less pains were taken
to conceal the warlike measures undertaken on either side. In the
beginning of 1755, Braddock’s ill-fated expedition was dispatched to
New England, while a counter-expedition for Canada was sent out from
Brest and Rochefort, a few weeks later. Neither side was acting in
good faith: on both sides, secret instructions for active hostilities
were given to the commanders. In June, two French ships, with troops
on board, were captured by Boscawen off the coast of Newfoundland.
Exactly a month later, Braddock’s force was cut to pieces by the
French and Indians. Still the pretence of peace was preserved. In
April 1756, a French expedition sailed from Toulon to attack Minorca,
which for half a century had been a British possession. Byng’s
well-known failure to relieve Minorca ensued, and the place fell on
27th June.
Meanwhile the absurdity of maintaining the semblance of peace under
such circumstances had become patent to the British cabinet, and in
May, war was formally declared. In August, the coalition of France
and Austria, soon to be joined by Russia, was declared against
Prussia, and Great Britain found herself engaged in hostilities in
Germany, India and America at the same time.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account