The Nobel Prize winners in literature — John Shaqi
The Nobel Prize winners in literatureMarble, Annie Russell
History
The Nobel Prize winners in literature
Marble, Annie Russell
Authors; Literature -- History and criticism; Nobel Prize winners; Nobel Prizes; Nobel, Alfred Bernhard, 1833-1896
Seven years before the publication of _Hymn to Satan_, Carducci had
become identified, as professor, with the University of Bologna; here
he remained until his death--a period of forty-six years of educational
service. The first offer from Mamiani, as Minister of Education, was
to the Turin Lycée but the poet was unwilling to leave Tuscany. After
a little delay the chair of elocution--and later of literature--was
open to him at Bologna. His influence upon students of all types was
stimulating, always conducive to individual expression and ambition.
After the appearance of _Hymn to Satan_ he was in marked disfavor with
the government. His liberal ideas were in high favor with the students,
however, so that it seemed wise to “make a change” by offering him
a position to teach Latin at Naples. Carducci refused on the ground
that he was not qualified to teach Latin. He was prohibited from
continuing classroom instruction at Bologna, on the ground of “constant
opposition to the acts of the Government.” Affairs were quieted by a
change of ministers and the poet, wisely, refrained from promulgating
political doctrines in the University, or from giving dominance to
them in his later volumes of poems, like _Levia grandia_, in 1867,
and _Nuove poesie_, in 1873. Mr. Bickersteth has emphasized duly the
more restrained, tender note in the later volume, following soon after
the loss of his mother and his son. So different were the lyrics from
his previous type, so surely did they show the influence of Goethe,
Schiller, and Heine, in romanticism, that some critics accused Carducci
of being a mere imitator, or even a plagiarist. This challenge aroused
his ever-present spirit and he wrote the prose defense, with broad as
well as personal comment, _Critica ed arte_.
As lecturer, he became yearly more popular and students from distant
places hastened to come under his inspiration. He was one of the
noteworthy exponents of Dante. When Rome established a chair of Dante
Exigesis, Carducci was appointed as professor. Although sorry to lose
him at Bologna, the whole country applauded the honor. He hesitated,
because he was not in accord with those who interpreted Dante by
contemporary political conditions, those who had founded the chair at
Rome. Later he became one of “four leading Dante scholars” who gave
short courses of lectures each year. At his first lecture there was
an effort to make a political demonstration by the anti-Papal party.
Among his sentences at this first discourse he said, “Papacy and
Empire, their discord and their power, were passing away when Dante was
born--Dante who does not pass away.” In an earlier sonnet, published in
essays in 1874, he had interpreted what he believed were Dante’s views
and the reason for his immortal fame:[48]
Dante, whence comes it that my vows and voice,
Adoring thy proud lineaments I raise;
That, o’er thy verse, which made thee lean and wan,
The sun may set, the new dawn finds me still?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account