The Non-religion of the Future: A Sociological Study — John Shaqi
The Non-religion of the Future: A Sociological StudyGuyau, Jean-Marie
Religion
The Non-religion of the Future: A Sociological Study
Guyau, Jean-Marie
Irreligion and sociology; Religion; Social sciences
In the beginning, not only moral and
religious life, but civil and political life, rested upon the grossest
errors, on absolute monarchy, divine right, caste, and slavery; all
this barbarity possessed a certain utility, but its utility precisely
consisted in its leading to its own extinction; it served as a means
of handing us on to something better. What distinguishes the living
mechanism from other mechanisms is that the outer springs precisely
labour to cause themselves to be superseded; that the movement once
produced is perpetual. If we possessed means of projection powerful
enough to rival those of nature, we might convert a cannon ball into
an eternal satellite of the earth, without its being necessary to
impart movement to it a second time. A result accomplished in nature
is accomplished once for all. A step forward if it is real and not
illusory, and in especial if it is completely conscious, renders
impossible a step backward.
[6] See pt. 2, chap. iv.
In the eighteenth century the attack on religion was directed by
philosophical partisans of _a priori_ principles, who were persuaded
that the instant a faith was proved to be absurd that was the end
of it. In our days the attack is led by historians who possess an
absolute respect for fact, which they are inclined to erect into a
law, historians who pass a learned existence in the midst of absurdity
in all its forms, and for whom the irrational, instead of condemning
a belief in which it appears, is often a condition of its duration.
Therein lies the difference between the attitude of the eighteenth
century and that of the nineteenth toward religion. The eighteenth
century hated religion and wished to destroy it. The nineteenth century
endeavours to understand religion and cannot reconcile itself to seeing
so charming an object of study disappear. The historian’s device is,
“What has been, will be”; he is naturally inclined to model his
conception of the future on his knowledge of the past. A witness of the
futility of revolutions, he sometimes forgets that complete evolution
is possible: an evolution which transforms things to their very roots
and metamorphoses human beings and their beliefs to an extent that
renders them unrecognizable.[7]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account