The Non-religion of the Future: A Sociological StudyGuyau, Jean-Marie
Religion
The Non-religion of the Future: A Sociological Study
Guyau, Jean-Marie
Irreligion and sociology; Religion; Social sciences
One point may legitimately be regarded as attained by contemporary
criticism. After the labours of Herr Roskoff, M. Réville, and M. Girard
de Rialle, it is impossible to maintain that there exist nowadays on
the surface of the earth whole peoples absolutely without religion
or superstition, which among non-civilized people amount to the same
thing.[8] The reason why man is a superstitious or religious being is
simply that he possesses a high degree of intelligence. Megalithic
monuments (menhirs, cromlechs, dolmens), sepulchres, amulets, are
trustworthy evidence of the existence of religion in prehistoric times;
and those fragments of bone detached from the skull and pierced with
holes to pass a string through—“cranial rounds”—belong, no doubt,
to the same category.[9] Manifestations of the religious spirit date
back thus to the age of polished stone. And to pass from facts to
hypotheses it is conceivable that at the beginning of the quaternary
period, perhaps two hundred and fifty thousand years ago, man was
already feeding upon vague and elementary superstitions, though he does
not appear to have felt sufficient respect for his dead to have dug
sepulchres, and although no fetiches belonging to that period have been
discovered.
[8] Herr Roskoff, _Das Religionswesen der rohesten
Naturvoelker_ (Leipzig, 1880); M. Girard de Rialle, _Mythologie
comparée_ (Paris, 1878); M. Réville, _Les religions des peuples
non civilisés_ (Paris, 1880).
[9] See M. G. De Mortillet, _Le préhistorique. Antiquité de
l’homme_ (Paris, 1883).
[Sidenote: Established fact that religion is of natural origin.]
A second point which may be regarded as equally established, and which
results in important consequences in the matter of method of research,
is that religion, being of natural origin, must have developed slowly
and in accordance with universal and regular laws; it must have
originated in simple and vague notions of some sort, accessible to
the most primitive intelligence. And from that starting point it must
have risen by gradual evolution to the complex and precise conceptions
which characterize it to-day. It is in vain for religions to believe
themselves immutable; they have all of them been borne forward
unwittingly by the movement of universal evolution. The great Egyptian
Sphinx, who has not changed her position in the desert these four
thousand years, might believe herself to be stationary, but she has
never ceased for an instant to whirl through space, borne along by the
earth’s motion around the sun.
[Sidenote: Two contrasted theories of its origin.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account