The Norse discoverers of America : $b the Wineland sagas translated & discussedGathorne-Hardy, G. M. (Geoffrey Malcolm)
History
The Norse discoverers of America : $b the Wineland sagas translated & discussed
Gathorne-Hardy, G. M. (Geoffrey Malcolm)
America -- Discovery and exploration -- Norse
seems to me that the delay necessary to collect the samples of local
products mentioned in Eric’s Saga and Hauk’s Book is most unlikely to
have taken place if the discovery of the country was accidental and the
party desirous of returning to Greenland. For these reasons, therefore,
in addition to those given above, it seems to me that we are justified
in taking the Flatey version as authentic.
Storm, in his _Studier over Vinlandsreisrne_, urges that it was more
likely that Leif, returning from Norway to Greenland, should have been
driven out of his course to America than that Bjarni should have met
the same fate on the shorter journey from Iceland. In the state of
navigation at the time it is course by no means incredible that either
captain should have missed his destination by the necessary margin.
There were practically no limits to the possible deviation in those
days. Thorstein, sailing to Wineland, is said to have been driven by
contrary gales to the neighbourhood both of Iceland and Ireland, and
whether this be true or no it clearly cannot have struck an Icelandic
audience as at all improbable. It has however to be remembered that
Leif, assuming the discovery to have been made on the voyage from
Norway, was retracing a known course, and traversing a known distance;
and if we follow the only version which supplies information on the
point, he, like Karlsefni, was carried first to Helluland, which seems
to argue a direction of the wind which could not be very unfavourable
for his projected destination, Greenland; Bjarni, on the other hand,
set out on a voyage of uncertain length across an unknown sea, and his
landfall in America is stated to have been so far to the south as to
point to really contrary winds. Subject to these remarks I do not think
that there is much in the point, either one way or the other.
_Thorvald._
The next difference to be noted is with regard to the fate of Thorvald
Ericson. The Flatey Book assigns to him an independent voyage, and
a reasonable death at the hands of the savages. The details of this
voyage are given at length, and substantially in a natural and credible
form. The other version of his death is clearly incredible, for it
introduces the agency of a ‘uniped’, fabulous creature, not unknown to
classical legend.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account