The North Americans of Antiquity: Their origin, migrations, and type of civilization consideredShort, John T. (John Thomas)
History
The North Americans of Antiquity: Their origin, migrations, and type of civilization considered
Short, John T. (John Thomas)
Indians -- Origin; Indians of Mexico -- Antiquities; Indians of North America -- Antiquities
Perhaps we may more
properly place him in a position midway between the flint and the
stone ages (new-stone or Neolithic), for he no doubt was possessed of
polished stone implements of a limited number and variety. Whether made
by his own hands or by those of his predecessors is uncertain.[4] In
thus assigning the Indian his place in the scale by which man’s state
of barbarism or degree of civilization has been measured by scholars in
Europe, we do not pretend to claim for him the antiquity of the man of
the flint age in any other part of the globe.[5]
[Illustration: Arrow Heads in the National Museum (Washington).]
[Illustration: Methods Employed by Indians of Hafting Stone Weapons.]
[Illustration: Indian and Mound-builder Spear-Heads.]
Dr. Abbott, of New Jersey, in an extended treatment of the _Stone Age_
in his own State, has shown many evidences of the protracted occupancy
of the Atlantic States by a people whose weapons resemble those of
ancient man in Europe. Col. Charles Whittlesey has called attention
to the discovery of Indian remains in the “Shelter Cave,” near
Elyria, Ohio, and also in a cave near Louisville, Kentucky, where the
conditions seemed to point to an interment as long ago as two thousand
years, but the evidences both as to the remains having been those of
the red man and the period of burial are too uncertain to be of any
service in the construction of a theory.[6]
The eras or ages which have been observed to mark the different stages
of the development of pre-historic man in Europe (in the manufacture
of implements and the construction of places of abode), are apparently
reversed in America.
The Neolithic and Bronze ages preceded the Palæolithic at least in
the Mississippi Basin—not that the last inhabitants deteriorated and
lost the higher arts which are well known to have been cultivated upon
the same soil occupied by them, but that they were preceded by a race
possessed of no inferior civilization, who were not their ancestors,
but a distinct people with a capacity for progress, for the exercise of
government, for the erection of magnificent architectural monuments,
and possessed of a respectable knowledge of geometrical principles.
The remains of this mysterious people known as the mound-builders
are spread over thousands of square miles of the United States, and
it is a question whether the antiquarian is more surprised at the
greatness of their number than in many instances at the immensity
of their proportions. The entire valley region of the Missouri,
Mississippi and Ohio rivers with that of their affluents was occupied
by this remarkable people—presenting us with a parallel to the ancient
civilization which flourished in the earliest times on the watercourses
of the old world. The geographical distribution of these mounds may be
described in general terms with a view to the territory occupied by
them in the United States, as central, western, and southern.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account