The North Americans of Antiquity: Their origin, migrations, and type of civilization consideredShort, John T. (John Thomas)
History
The North Americans of Antiquity: Their origin, migrations, and type of civilization considered
Short, John T. (John Thomas)
Indians -- Origin; Indians of Mexico -- Antiquities; Indians of North America -- Antiquities
morals, of confessional ceremonies and a humane and enlightened system
of religion at Cholula, and afterwards disappeared toward the East
upon the waters of the Gulf. With the rule of the Cocomes and the
annals of that remarkable branch of the Chiapan family, composed of
Maya and Nahua elements known as the Tutul Xius, we have nothing to do
in this work.[360] Las Casas, in examining the doctrine of Hunab Ku,
“the only God” among the Yucatecoes, who is described as the father
of Zamna, discovered a most striking Christ myth; one which conforms
so closely to the gospel account of Christ’s birth and ministry that
we must conclude that either some foreigner must have been cast upon
the coast after the Christian era began, bringing the gospel with him,
or that one of two views is true, namely, that the Fathers fabricated
the story, or that the natives, expecting favor of their conquerors,
endeavored to harmonize their belief with that which was being taught
them. Las Casas tells us of their belief in a Trinity consisting of
Izona, the Father; Bacab, the Son, and Echuah, the Holy Ghost.[361]
The Son was born of the Virgin Chibirias, and was rejected of men, was
scourged and crucified on a tree with cross-arms; he descended into
the regions of the dead, but rose again on the third day, and finally
ascended to heaven. In fact the story is the Apostles’ Creed without
the “Credo,” and is probably as much the work of the credulous and
imaginative Spanish Fathers as of the designing natives. The story
ought to be repudiated without question. It only remains for us to
submit the question to the reader, whether the Maya peoples are not of
transatlantic origin, as we believe the facts in this chapter indicate.
CHAPTER VI.
TRADITIONAL HISTORY OF THE ORIGIN OF THE NAHUA NATIONS.
The Early Inhabitants of Mexico — Quinames — Miztecs and Zapotecs
— Totonacs and Huastecs — Olmecs and Xicalancas — The Nahuas —
The Cholula Pyramid — Its Origin Explained in the Duran MS. —
No Relation to a Flood — Ixtlilxochitl’s Deluge Tradition — The
first Toltecs — The Codex Chimalpopoca Account — The Discovery
of Maize — Sahagun’s Origin of the Nahuas — They came from
Florida — Their Settlement in Tamoanchan — Their Migrations
— Hue Hue Tlapalan — Its Location, according to the Sources
— Not Identical with Tlapallan de Cortés — Not in Central
America — Probably in the Mississippi Valley — Beginning of the
Toltec Annals — The Chichimecs not Nahuas — The Nahuatlacas —
The Aztecs — Aztlan — As Described by Early Writers — Aztec
Migration — Aztec Maps — Señor Ramirez on Migration Maps — The
Seven Caves — Three Claims for the Location of Aztlan — The
Culture Hero — Quetzalcoatl.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account