The North Americans of Antiquity: Their origin, migrations, and type of civilization consideredShort, John T. (John Thomas)
History
The North Americans of Antiquity: Their origin, migrations, and type of civilization considered
Short, John T. (John Thomas)
Indians -- Origin; Indians of Mexico -- Antiquities; Indians of North America -- Antiquities
feet square and the height fifty-four feet. The pyramid is seven
stories high and apparently solid, except the topmost story which
contained interior departments. This crowning structure is now sadly
dilapidated. Dupaix’s statement, copied by Humboldt, that the material
of the pyramid is porphyry, cut in immense blocks, appears to be an
error, since later exploration has revealed the fact that the pyramid
was constructed of regularly cut blocks of sandstone laid in mortar,
and coated with a hard, smooth cement, three inches thick. A stairway
on the eastern front is divided as well as being guarded by solid stone
balustrades.[531]
For Nahua monuments of the purest type we naturally turn to Anahuac
the home of Toltec and Aztec art during its most advanced period of
development. But alas! the hand of the conqueror and the zeal of the
fanatic have robbed irretrievably the antiquarian and the student
of the history of architecture and art, of the best and noblest
remains of that strangely interesting civilization. Our attention
is naturally directed to the architecture of that ancient religious
centre—Cholula—the origin of which, together with that of its great
pyramid, we have described in a previous chapter. We have already
seen that the prime object for erecting the immense pile, according
to Duran, was the worship of the sun, and not to afford a refuge from
a deluge as has been generally supposed. The pyramid of Cholula is
situated in the eastern portion of a village to which it has given its
name, and is reached by a ride of about ten miles westward from the
city of Puebla de los Angelos. The magnificent temple upon its summit
dedicated to Quetzalcoatl, fell a prey to the destroying vengeance
of Cortez, who no doubt was enraged at the stubborn resistance with
which he was met by the devoted natives, in a hard-fought battle at
the foot and upon the slopes of the pyramid. Of the large number of
descriptions, either made from personal observation or written from a
comparison of accounts, none surpass that of Humboldt, which was the
result of a careful survey, performed in 1803. Humboldt’s drawing,
however, was a restoration and not a picture of the condition of
the shrub-grown hill as he saw it.[532] The pyramid, according to
Humboldt, measures at the base six hundred and thirty-nine metres or
a trifle more than fourteen hundred and twenty-eight feet square; in
other words, about forty-four acres. The base is shown by Humboldt to
be more than twice as large as that of Cheops. Humboldt and Dupaix
give its height as fifty-four metres or one hundred and seventy-seven
feet; Mayer says it is two hundred and four feet; Tylor, two hundred
and five feet, and Heller[533] states that its summit platform covers
an area of 13,285 square feet. Its height is somewhat greater than
that of the pyramid of Mycerinus. Humboldt compares it to a mass of
brick, covering a square four times as large as the Place Vendôme and
twice the height of the Louvre.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account