The North Americans of Antiquity: Their origin, migrations, and type of civilization considered — John Shaqi
The North Americans of Antiquity: Their origin, migrations, and type of civilization consideredShort, John T. (John Thomas)
History
The North Americans of Antiquity: Their origin, migrations, and type of civilization considered
Short, John T. (John Thomas)
Indians -- Origin; Indians of Mexico -- Antiquities; Indians of North America -- Antiquities
Prof. C. G. Forshey in _Foster’s Pre-Historic Races_, presents most
valuable information relative to the mounds in the south-west. His
observations convince us that the State of Louisiana and the valleys of
the Arkansas and Red Rivers were not only the most thickly populated
wing of the Mound-builder domain, but also furnish us with remains
presenting affinities with the great works of Mexico so striking that
no doubt can longer exist that the same people were the architects
of both. He describes works, some of them of immense proportions, on
the Mississippi fifty miles above Vicksburg; on Walnut Bayou; the
south-west bend of Lake St. Joseph, and at Trinity in the parish of
Catahoula, Louisiana. On the east bank of the Little River, a couple of
miles above its mouth, where it empties into Lake Ocalohoola, stands a
bluff walled with roughly hewn stone. The same writer observed a mound
near Natchez twenty-five feet high, standing isolated in a swamp. This
mound is one among many in different parts of the lower Mississippi
region surmounted by comparatively younger trees than are found on the
remains farther north. Works occur in the Atchafalaya basin, in the
rear of Baton Rouge, on the uplands of Lake Pontchartrain and on the
banks of Bayou Gros Tête. A remarkable group of truncated pyramids,
peculiarly Mexican in their style of architecture, exist in Madison
Parish, Louisiana, and are figured in Squier and Davis and copied
by Foster.[62] It is needless to discuss the fact that the works of
the Mound-builders exist in considerable numbers in Texas, extending
across the Rio Grande into Mexico, establishing an unmistakable
relationship as well as actual union between the truncated pyramids
of the Mississippi Valley and the Tocalli of Mexico and the countries
further south.[63] There can be no doubt as to the unity of the origin
of the works in both countries. There are evidences also that the most
recent works of Louisiana and Texas do not compare in antiquity with
any found in the Ohio Valley, showing it to be altogether probable
that the Mound-builders occupied the Lower Mississippi Valley and
Gulf coast for a considerable period after they were driven from the
northern and central region by their enemies.[64] Several recent
writers, with no more proof than that obsidian from Mexico has been
found in the mounds, have confidently expressed the belief that the
Mound-builders entered the Mississippi Valley and the Central Region
from the South. This was based also on the assumption that no remains
were found in the North-west. It, however, is proper to note here the
marks of architectural progression observable in the geographical
distribution of ancient works. Men all around the world have been
mound or pyramid builders. To attempt to demonstrate this well-known
fact to an intelligent reader by citing the customs of antiquity and
the works of the present great Asiatic nations, would seem little
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account