The North-Americans of yesterday : $b a comparative study of North-American Indian life, customs, and products, on the theory of the ethnic unity of the raceDellenbaugh, Frederick Samuel
History
The North-Americans of yesterday : $b a comparative study of North-American Indian life, customs, and products, on the theory of the ethnic unity of the race
Dellenbaugh, Frederick Samuel
Indians of Mexico; Indians of North America
well established by evidence was the case. Some of the mounds were of
enormous size, the famous one at Cahokia, Illinois, being one of the
highest and largest on the continent. Its altitude is about ninety
feet, and it contains nearly 500,000 cubic yards of earth. Its purpose
is, of course, not known, but it probably supported some religious
structure of wood. Many of the mounds, as pointed out in the chapter on
dwellings, were merely supports for buildings, religious or otherwise.
Others were connected with religious rites in other ways. Doubtless the
figures of birds found in Wisconsin represented the “Thunder-bird,” of
which there are legends and traditions in many tribes. It was to the
Amerind the cause of the thunder and lightning. These great and small
earthworks were constructed in the United States by scooping up earth
from the vicinity and carrying it in baskets to the designated spot.
The United States mounds are, as a rule, made of earth, those of Mexico
and Central America of clay or adobe brick, faced with stone or wholly
of stone. “It is often the case,” says Thomas, speaking of the burial
mounds of the Mississippi valley, “when a mound is carefully excavated
and closely scanned as the work proceeds, especially where the material
is clay or muck, that the individual loads can be readily discerned.
As the earth of which the mounds is composed is usually gathered up
from the surrounding surface, the interior will vary in color and
character only as the soil so gathered up varies.... The places from
whence material was taken to build the small or moderate-sized mounds
are seldom discernible at the present day, but depressions plainly
mark the points about the larger works, as the Cahokia and Etowah
mounds and some of the enclosures of Ohio and elsewhere.[307] In some
cases the one act has been made to serve two purposes, that is to say,
the earth used to construct the mound or other work has been taken
from one or two points so as to leave a basin-shaped excavation for
holding water, or to form a trench to serve as a protective moat, or
for drainage or other purposes.” For a long time it was believed by
a great many persons, scientific and otherwise, that these piles of
earth, often called pyramids quite erroneously, could not have been
made by ordinary Amerinds, but as the study of the native American
proceeded and the data of what he did and does actually do began to be
recorded, it was perfectly plain that it was not at all necessary to
look beyond the “Indian” for the origin of the mounds—that is, beyond
the “Indian” as he was known in the region where the mounds occur. It
was found that he had erected mounds after the arrival of the whites,
and if he built one or several he might have built all. It was not a
very difficult operation to dig up earth and carry it a few hundred
feet and drop it on a pile. The transportation of the stones referred
to above was far more laborious, and modern Amerinds do a great deal
harder work.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account