The North-Americans of yesterday : $b a comparative study of North-American Indian life, customs, and products, on the theory of the ethnic unity of the raceDellenbaugh, Frederick Samuel
History
The North-Americans of yesterday : $b a comparative study of North-American Indian life, customs, and products, on the theory of the ethnic unity of the race
Dellenbaugh, Frederick Samuel
Indians of Mexico; Indians of North America
The Navajos are fairly good labourers, and the Mokis carry
all their wood from forests fifteen miles away. It is work to carry
water up the cliffs where the Mokis live, it is work to hoe the corn,
it is work to tend and herd sheep. On full investigation it seems
strange that it should ever have been thought that the mounds were not
“Indian” because they represented work. Fowke has estimated that a
mound a hundred feet in diameter and twenty feet high could have been
erected by the “Indians” in forty-two days. I have seen Uingkaret Utes
in Arizona carry on their backs with ease for twelve or fifteen miles
loads that would average about thirty or forty pounds. People who can
do this could carry earth in short stretches for forty or fifty days.
It is probable, however, that the mounds were not built by steady and
consecutive labour, but rather by intermittent effort, after the usual
fashion of Amerindian work.
[Illustration: BACK OF VOTIVE ADZ
For front and side see page 339
From _Monumental Records_
]
[Illustration: PATTERNS OF ANCIENT FABRICS FROM POTTERY
From New York
From Illinois
From Tennessee
See page 108
]
Many mounds and earthworks were erected for defensive purposes at
points controlling river passages or trails, where the advance of foes
invading a country could be checked. There were also fortification
works like the so-called “hill-forts” of the eastern portion of the
United States, and the “cérros trinchéras” of northern Mexico. Quoting
again from Thomas,[308] one of the best authorities on mounds and
“Moundbuilders”: “The most extensive example of the ‘hill-forts’ is
that known as Fort Ancient, in Warren County, Ohio. This crowns a spur
of the bluff some two hundred and fifty or three hundred feet high,
which here overhangs the Miami River. The area embraced is only some
seventy-five or eighty acres, but the length of the wall, which follows
all the windings and zigzags of the margin of the bluff and of the
side ravines, is a little over three miles and a half. This is one of
the best-preserved monuments of the Ohio valley, the surrounding wall
being uninjured save at points where the turnpike cuts through it, and
at a few places where ravines have been formed since it was abandoned.
This wall, which is partly of stone, but chiefly of dirt thrown up
from the inner or upper side, varies in height from three or four to
nineteen feet, and from twenty-five to seventy feet in width at the
base. As the earth has all been taken from the inside (except along the
high wall which crosses the level at the rear) and thrown outward on
the crest of the slope, this has left an inside ditch. As a rule, the
wall is strongest and highest at the points of easiest approach; and at
some places the outside slope has been artificially steepened, proving
beyond any reasonable doubt that the work was one of defence.”
[Illustration: ESKIMO MECHANICAL TOY.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account