The North-Americans of yesterday : $b a comparative study of North-American Indian life, customs, and products, on the theory of the ethnic unity of the raceDellenbaugh, Frederick Samuel
History
The North-Americans of yesterday : $b a comparative study of North-American Indian life, customs, and products, on the theory of the ethnic unity of the race
Dellenbaugh, Frederick Samuel
Indians of Mexico; Indians of North America
Just why the Newark works have the particular arrangement they have
would be impossible to say without knowing the customs of the tribe
that built them and the circumstances of the time. It is probable,
however, that some enclosures were farm fences. The plan suggests two
communal villages, closely allied and united by a sort of runway,
which, while preventing hostiles from separating the two villages
in time of attack, always afforded a safe passage for the women and
children from one town to the other. The builders were evidently beset
by enemies at the time the works were occupied, but this does not
necessarily imply that when the works were abandoned the occupants
were driven out or annihilated, for their enemies may have been people
of their own stock with whom they eventually became reconciled, or
the enemies may have passed on to other fields, or the occupants of
the works may have grown more powerful and at length have assumed
the offensive. Abandoned works, I repeat, do not necessarily mean
annihilation of the builders. The South-west offers countless examples
of the truth of this statement. Villages and works were abandoned
there for a variety of causes; sometimes it was little more than
caprice. Quoting Thomas again: “Nor is the theory that, while some of
the monuments are due to the Indians, others are to be ascribed to a
different race, justified by the data, or reasonable, as no one is
able to define the characters which distinguish the classes. If the
Indians built mounds of the most advanced type and of large size, as
history shows positively the natives of the Gulf States did, there
is no necessity for attributing the works of the middle and northern
sections to a different race. That the Moundbuilders were divided into
various and often contending tribes, is shown by the works for defence
and protection, as also by the evidences of varying customs. Yet there
is nothing in the antiquities to indicate a higher culture than that
of the southern Indians or a greater difference between the people
of the different sections than existed among the natives when first
encountered by the whites.” Granting this, there is still nothing to
prove that some of these tribes did not come from a long distance off,
for the Amerinds very often have been travellers.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account